Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add CardSorting/LUMI-JOY --skill code-refactorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CardSorting/LUMI-JOYWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cardsorting/lumi-joy/code-refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cardsorting/lumi-joy/code-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cardsorting/lumi-joy/code-refactor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cardsorting/lumi-joy/code-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cardsorting/lumi-joy/code-refactor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00143 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00057 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00029 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
code-refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Refactor Specialist
Clean architecture refactoring specialist enforcing SOLID principles, strict TypeScript interfaces, and zero barrel imports.
📋 Execution Protocol
- Analyze Input: Validate preconditions and inspect operational context.
- Execute Actions: Carry out procedures using deterministic tools.
- Verify Outcome: Assert correctness and log diagnostic telemetry.
🛡️ Operational Guardrails & Rules
- Execute with deterministic consistency and verify outputs.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 20 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 04f9204c244a
code-refactor is a skill published in the GitHub repository CardSorting/LUMI-JOY (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 143 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
AI-powered code review and PR analysis. Performs systematic reviews covering security vulnerabilities, code quality, style compliance, architectural integrity, test coverage, and performance considerations. Works with PR diffs, commit ranges, file changes, or raw code snippets. Primary keyword clusters: AI code review…
sast-businesslogic
Detect business logic vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: threat modeling (domain analysis and attack scenarios), batched verify (check exploitable gaps in parallel subagents, 3 scenarios each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers price manipulation, workflow bypass, limit violations…
sast-sqli
Detect SQL injection vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find unsafe SQL construction sites), batched verify (trace user input to those sites in parallel subagents, 3 sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers string concat, f-strings, unsafe ORM methods, and dynamic…
sast-graphql
Detect GraphQL injection vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (confirm GraphQL usage and find unsafe operation document assembly sites), batched verify (trace user input to those sites in parallel subagents, up to 3 candidate sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires…
sast-idor
Detect Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find candidates), batched verify (check authorization in parallel subagents, 3 candidates each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Checks endpoints for missing ownership or authorization checks on…
sast-ssrf
Detect Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find outbound call sites), batched verify (trace user input to destinations in parallel subagents, 3 sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first).…