agentic-github-discussion

A GitHub Discussions tool for the agentic.nvim repository. GitHub Discussions are forum-style pages where a project community can ask questions, share ideas, and post announcements.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to create, list, and manage discussions in carlos-algms/agentic.nvim, including choosing categories and applying labels.
Why use it?
It removes the need to remember the repository’s GraphQL identifiers, discussion categories, and label identifiers when managing discussions.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/carlos-algms/agentic.nvim/agentic-github-discussion
Any agent
npx skills add carlos-algms/agentic.nvim --skill agentic-github-discussion
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/carlos-algms/agentic.nvim

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 29 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,330 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00029 $0.01330
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.00665
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00266
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00133

Measured 3d ago against content hash 6ab047ec6915, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

agentic-github-discussion scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/agentic-github-discussion/SKILL.md · 209 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 209 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

GitHub Discussion

Manage discussions in carlos-algms/agentic.nvim via GraphQL API.

IDs Reference

Repository ID: R_kgDOQXqKiw

Categories

Category ID
Announcements DIC_kwDOQXqKi84C1alq
General DIC_kwDOQXqKi84C1alr
Ideas DIC_kwDOQXqKi84C1alt
Polls DIC_kwDOQXqKi84C1alv
Q&A DIC_kwDOQXqKi84C1als
Research DIC_kwDOQXqKi84C1alw
Show and tell DIC_kwDOQXqKi84C1alu

Labels

Label ID
bug LA_kwDOQXqKi88AAAACQBotaQ
documentation LA_kwDOQXqKi88AAAACQBoteg
duplicate LA_kwDOQXqKi88AAAACQBotgw
enhancement LA_kwDOQXqKi88AAAACQBotkQ
good first issue LA_kwDOQXqKi88AAAACQBotpA
help wanted LA_kwDOQXqKi88AAAACQBotnA
invalid LA_kwDOQXqKi88AAAACQBotqA
not-acp-standard LA_kwDOQXqKi88AAAACQBottw
question LA_kwDOQXqKi88AAAACQBotrw
quality-of-life LA_kwDOQXqKi88AAAACVMzaQA

Usage

Default category: Research

Override: /agentic-github-discussion Ideas or /agentic-github-discussion Q&A

Create Discussion

gh api graphql -f query='
mutation {
  createDiscussion(input: {
    repositoryId: "R_kgDOQXqKiw",
    categoryId: "DIC_kwDOQXqKi84C1alw",
    title: "TITLE",
    body: "BODY"
  }) {
    discussion {
      id
      url
    }
  }
}'

List Discussions

gh api graphql -f query='
{
  repository(owner: "carlos-algms", name: "agentic.nvim") {
    discussions(first: 10, orderBy: {field: CREATED_AT, direction: DESC}) {
      nodes {
        id
        number
        title
        url
        category { name }
        labels(first: 5) { nodes { name } }
      }
    }
  }
}'

Filter by category:

gh api graphql -f query='
{
  repository(owner: "carlos-algms", name: "agentic.nvim") {
    discussions(first: 10, categoryId: "DIC_kwDOQXqKi84C1alw") {
      nodes { number title url }
    }
  }
}'

Read the full file on GitHub · 209 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 209 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 6ab047ec6915

Subscribe to this mod's changes

agentic-github-discussion is a skill published in the GitHub repository carlos-algms/agentic.nvim (609 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,330 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

add

Categorize new Neovim plugins and insert them into the correct markdown category files.

yutkat/my-neovim-pluginlist · 18 tokens

write-teach-commit

Draft teach: commit messages for .github/workflows/improve-add-skill.yml. Use when preparing or reviewing a correction commit that should trigger the Improve Add Skill workflow from $add categorization feedback, including moved plugin entries, removed or excluded plugins, changed .reason.md categories, or…

yutkat/my-neovim-pluginlist · 82 tokens

improve-add-skill

Improve the repo-local add skill from reviewed Neovim plugin categorization corrections. Use when a correction commit, PR review result, diff, or artifact such as a teach: commit shows that $add placed, excluded, or reasoned about plugins incorrectly and the reusable lesson should be folded back into…

yutkat/my-neovim-pluginlist · 75 tokens

git-branch-commit-pr

Automates the workflow of creating a feature branch, committing changes, and opening a PR. Use this when asked to create a branch, make changes, commit, and open a pull request for Lua code improvements or fixes.

juhaku/aiwaku.nvim · 51 tokens

source-drafting

Use when drafting documents, reports, posts, presentations, or review comments from source materials, or conducting research across provided documents. Enforces read-first drafting, a source map for every claim, agent verification, and separation of verified from unverified claims.

nicknisi/dotfiles · 54 tokens

github-pr-create

Create a pull request with an auto-generated description. Use when the user asks to open a PR for the current branch's changes.

aiya000/dotfiles · 30 tokens