Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add CaseyLabs/kc-secure-repo-template --skill github-hardeninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CaseyLabs/kc-secure-repo-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/caseylabs/kc-secure-repo-template/github-hardening)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/caseylabs/kc-secure-repo-template/github-hardening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/caseylabs/kc-secure-repo-template/github-hardening/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/caseylabs/kc-secure-repo-template/github-hardening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/caseylabs/kc-secure-repo-template/github-hardening.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.00564 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00226 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00113 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
github-hardening scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 17d ago Changed · +6 lines · -8 tokens per session c4718073764c
- 1mo ago First seen · 53 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A db5dd1567a39
github-hardening is a skill published in the GitHub repository CaseyLabs/kc-secure-repo-template (9 stars, last pushed 3d ago), with no licence file. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 564 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd
Scans GitHub Actions workflows and CI/CD pipeline configurations for supply chain attack vectors including unpinned actions, script injection via expressions, dependency confusion, and secrets exposure. Uses PyGithub and YAML parsing for automated audit. Use when hardening CI/CD pipelines or investigating compromised…
securing-github-actions-workflows
This skill covers hardening GitHub Actions workflows against supply chain attacks, credential theft, and privilege escalation. It addresses pinning actions to SHA digests, minimizing GITHUBTOKEN permissions, protecting secrets from exfiltration, preventing script injection in workflow expressions, and implementing…
panning-for-gold
Triage raw unstructured input (transcripts, brain dumps) into evaluated thread inventories and a synthesized gold-found file. Four phases: front-gate, extract, evaluate, synthesize. Use when you say "pan for gold", "triage transcript", "synthesize gold-found", or hand it a voice transcript or brain dump. Do NOT use…
avoiding-manufactured-work
Detect and stop manufactured work after a deliverable appears done, and classify a post-completion finding into the four contract classes builder-ethos.md delegates here. Use when a worker has produced a plan, issue, PR, backlog item, research artifact, or follow-up task and you need to verify it was demanded by a…
securing-github-actions-workflows
This skill covers hardening GitHub Actions workflows against supply chain attacks, credential theft, and privilege escalation. It addresses pinning actions to SHA digests, minimizing GITHUBTOKEN permissions, protecting secrets from exfiltration, preventing script injection in workflow expressions, and implementing…
verification-quality
Truth scoring, code-quality verification, and automatic rollback with a high accuracy threshold. Use when validating agent output before it ships, gating changes on quality, or adding a verify-and-rollback safety loop.