Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Casper-Studios/casper-marketplace --skill resolve-pr-commentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Casper-Studios/casper-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/casper-studios/casper-marketplace/resolve-pr-comments)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/casper-studios/casper-marketplace/resolve-pr-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/casper-studios/casper-marketplace/resolve-pr-comments/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/casper-studios/casper-marketplace/resolve-pr-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/casper-studios/casper-marketplace/resolve-pr-comments.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.02066 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.01033 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00413 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00207 |
Grade A, and why
resolve-pr-comments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 255 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Comments — Triage & Fix
Fetch all unresolved PR review threads, deduplicate across bots, triage by severity, and produce a fix plan for human approval. After sign-off, resolve ignored threads and spawn subagents to fix real issues.
Invocation
/resolve-pr-comments— auto-detect PR from current branch/resolve-pr-comments 608— specific PR number
Phase 1: Fetch Unresolved Threads
1a. Identify the PR
# Auto-detect from current branch, or use the provided PR number
gh pr view --json number,headRepositoryOwner,title,headRefName,baseRefName
1b. Fetch ALL review threads via GraphQL
Use GraphQL to get thread resolution status — this is the only reliable source of truth.
gh api graphql -f query='
{
repository(owner: "{OWNER}", name: "{REPO_NAME}") {
pullRequest(number: {PR_NUMBER}) {
reviewThreads(first: 100) {
nodes {
id
isResolved
isOutdated
path
line
comments(first: 20) {
nodes {
databaseId
author { login }
body
path
line
originalLine
createdAt
url
}
}
}
}
}
}
}'
Paginate if hasNextPage is true. Collect every thread.
1c. Filter to unresolved threads only
- Keep threads where
isResolved == false - Note
isOutdated— the diff may have moved; flag these for extra scrutiny
1d. Also fetch issue-level comments (PR conversation tab)
gh api --paginate "repos/{OWNER}/{REPO_NAME}/issues/{PR_NUMBER}/comments?per_page=100"
Filter to comments from human reviewers only (not bots). These are often the most important.
Phase 2: Deduplicate & Classify
Multiple bots often flag the same underlying issue on the same file/line. Group them.
2a. Group by file + line range
Threads targeting the same file within a 5-line range likely address the same issue. Merge them into a single logical issue.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 255 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 87eca95b160a
resolve-pr-comments is a skill published in the GitHub repository Casper-Studios/casper-marketplace (12 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MPL-2.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 2,066 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
verify-behavior
Verify or reproduce visible product behavior by driving the real UI with pi-computer-use's checked tools, requiring verified expect postconditions and durable state evidence for meaningful UI flows. Use when triage needs visual reproduction, implementation needs behavioral proof, review needs interactive confirmation…
github-contributor
End-to-end playbook for shipping high-quality pull requests to open-source projects you don't maintain — discovery, CONTRIBUTING compliance, PR-size check, minimal-diff implementation, PR description with AI-assisted disclosure, conflict resolution, and post-submission maintainer interaction. Use whenever creating…
revdiff
Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…
write-pr
Reference standards for writing pull request titles and descriptions in the tldraw repository, plus the pre-flight comment sweep over the diff. Use as supporting guidance when another skill or workflow needs PR content standards, not as the user-facing create/update PR workflow.