Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cass-2003/local-workflow-skill --skill rfp-respondergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cass-2003/local-workflow-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cass-2003/local-workflow-skill/rfp-responder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cass-2003/local-workflow-skill/rfp-responder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cass-2003/local-workflow-skill/rfp-responder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cass-2003/local-workflow-skill/rfp-responder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cass-2003/local-workflow-skill/rfp-responder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00162 | $0.02938 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00081 | $0.01469 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00588 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00294 |
Grade A, and why
rfp-responder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 151 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
rfp-responder
Purpose
Help Bid Managers, Proposal Leads, and Directors of Sales answer five questions at the response-strategy moment:
- What is this RFP actually asking? (parse sections, tag every requirement MANDATORY / WEIGHTED / NICE-TO-HAVE, extract scoring criteria, surface deadlines and format constraints)
- What is our true fit? (proof-point matrix per requirement: STRONG / PARTIAL / GAP, each backed by a verifiable source — case study, certification, customer quote, technical attestation, benchmark)
- What is our win-theme strategy? (Shipley method: 3-5 themes that ladder up across requirements, not generic value-prop bullets)
- What is our realistic winrate? (Shipley-derived factor model: fit, incumbent, relationship strength, decision-criteria alignment, late-entry, competitor count, deal size — produces estimate + confidence band)
- Should we bid? (deterministic verdict: BID / PARTNER-BID / NO-BID with named factors driving the call)
The skill surfaces GAPs explicitly. Leadership decides whether to close them, partner around them, or no-bid. It never invents claims.
When to use
- A 30+ page RFP / RFI / RFQ has landed with a 7-14 day response deadline
- A security questionnaire (SIG, CAIQ, custom-buyer) needs structured Q&A — not prose
- The team is preparing a bid / no-bid review and needs a defensible winrate estimate
- Sales Engineering has a proof-point library but no system to map proofs to requirements
- Leadership wants to see fit % (STRONG / PARTIAL / GAP) before committing pursuit budget
- A late-entry opportunity needs honest assessment of the relationship deficit
Do not use for:
- Free-form proposal narrative authoring →
business-growth/contract-and-proposal-writer - Contract redline AFTER award →
c-level-advisor/general-counsel-advisor - Marketing collateral / category content →
marketing-skill/* - Discount approval on the awarded deal →
commercial/deal-desk - Pricing-model design for a new product →
commercial/pricing-strategist
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 151 lines · 162 tokens per session scan A a2268b74d86e
rfp-responder is a skill published in the GitHub repository cass-2003/local-workflow-skill (12 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 162 tokens to every session and 2,938 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…