adversarial-review

adversarial-review is a skill for Claude Code from CassioRoos/godfly-skills. It costs 186 tokens per session (2,059 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review toolkit for challenging code, pull requests, designs, plans, incidents, and strategies from several risk-focused viewpoints. It includes approaches such as failure-mode analysis, premortems, opposing arguments, and red-team review.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for investigating an artifact, testing its claims with evidence, exploring alternatives, and reaching a reasoned review verdict.
Why use it?
It helps find unsupported assumptions and ways work could fail before those problems reach users or production.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Good fit It is for investigating an artifact, testing its claims with evidence, exploring alternatives, and reaching a reasoned review verdict.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/cassioroos/godfly-skills/adversarial-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add CassioRoos/godfly-skills --skill adversarial-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CassioRoos/godfly-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for adversarial-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cassioroos/godfly-skills/adversarial-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cassioroos/godfly-skills/adversarial-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cassioroos/godfly-skills/adversarial-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cassioroos/godfly-skills/adversarial-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for adversarial-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cassioroos/godfly-skills/adversarial-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cassioroos/godfly-skills/adversarial-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 186 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,059 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00186 $0.02059
Opus 5.5 $0.00074 $0.00824
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00037 $0.00412
Haiku 4.5 $0.00019 $0.00206

Measured 15d ago against content hash 9c7a9b9b39e8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

adversarial-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/adversarial-review/SKILL.md · 172 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 172 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Adversarial Review

Find what breaks before production does. Investigate first, then challenge the work with evidence, then land on a verdict. The target is the artifact, never the people attached to it.

This skill is self-contained: everything it needs is in this file and in references/. Load a reference only when its lens is in play.

Pick the Lens

Situation / command Lens Read
PR, branch, incident fix, payment or data-integrity change (*review) Review + PR gate references/pr-incident-gate.md (non-skippable for PRs and incident fixes)
Launch readiness, attack paths, "what defends this" (*redblue) Red team / blue team references/red-blue.md
Before starting risky work, "it failed, why?" (*premortem) Premortem references/premortem.md
A decision is about to be made, argue the other side (*devil) Devil's advocate references/devils-advocate.md
Choosing between approaches, "what else could we do" (*alternatives) Competing alternatives references/alternatives.md
Reliability, "how does this break", SPOFs (*fail) Failure modes references/failure-modes.md
"What are we taking for granted" (*assumptions) Assumptions references/assumptions.md
"What would guarantee failure" (*invert) Inversion inline below

With no command, pick the lens from the request. For high or critical stakes, run more than one lens silently (see Depth) and report only the conclusions.

Depth

Stakes What runs
Low (naming, style) One-line note. No lens.
Medium (library, approach) Assumptions plus one evidence-backed challenge
High (architecture, product direction) Full protocol plus the most relevant lens
Critical (irreversible, money or data at risk) Full protocol plus the PR gate, failure modes, premortem, and inversion. Blocks until addressed.

Read the full file on GitHub · 172 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 15d ago First seen · 172 lines · 186 tokens per session scan A 9c7a9b9b39e8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

adversarial-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository CassioRoos/godfly-skills (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 186 tokens to every session and 2,059 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-23.

Related

adversarial-review compared with skills from other repositories

adversarial-review next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
adversarial-reviewCassioRoos/godfly-skillsSkill1yesterdayMITA186Claude Code
challenge-resolveBorda/AI-RigSkill31yesterdayApache-2.0A74Claude Code, Codex
code-remediateBorda/AI-RigSkill31yesterdayApache-2.0A39Claude Code, Codex
auditoliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenixSkill573yesterdayMITA35Claude Code
ai-slop-cleanervibeeval/vibecosystemSkill5392d agoMITA50Claude Code, Codex
code-review-webrampstackco/claude-skillsSkill1.0k11d agoMITA121Claude Code
java-code-reviewsivaprasadreddy/sivalabs-agent-skillsSkill1947d agoMITA64Claude Code