Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/workflow-lite-planexnpx skills add catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow --skill workflow-lite-planexgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-WorkflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/workflow-lite-planex)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/workflow-lite-planex"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/workflow-lite-planex.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00055 | $0.10820 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.05410 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.02164 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.01082 |
Grade A, and why
workflow-lite-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Auto Mode
When --yes or -y: Auto-confirm decomposition, skip interactive validation, use defaults.
Workflow Lite Planex
Usage
$workflow-lite-plan "Implement user authentication with OAuth, JWT, and 2FA"
$workflow-lite-plan -c 4 "Refactor payment module with Stripe and PayPal"
$workflow-lite-plan -y "Build notification system with email and SMS"
$workflow-lite-plan --continue "auth-20260228"
Flags:
-y, --yes: Skip all confirmations (auto mode)-c, --concurrency N: Max concurrent agents within each wave (default: 4)--continue: Resume existing session
Output Directory: .workflow/.lite-plan/{session-id}/
Overview
Explore-first wave-based pipeline using spawn_agents_on_csv. Two-stage CSV execution: explore.csv (codebase discovery) → tasks.csv (implementation), with cross-phase context propagation via context_from linking (E* → T*).
Core workflow: Decompose → [Confirm] → Wave Explore → Synthesize & Plan → [Confirm] → Wave Execute → Aggregate
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ WORKFLOW LITE PLANEX │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ Phase 1: Requirement → explore.csv │
│ ├─ Analyze complexity → select exploration angles (1-4) │
│ ├─ Generate explore.csv (1 row per angle) │
│ └─ ⛔ MANDATORY: User validates (skip ONLY if -y) │
│ │
│ Phase 2: Wave Explore (spawn_agents_on_csv) │
│ ├─ For each explore wave: │
│ │ ├─ Build wave CSV from explore.csv │
│ │ ├─ spawn_agents_on_csv(explore instruction template) │
│ │ └─ Merge findings/key_files into explore.csv │
│ └─ discoveries.ndjson shared across agents │
│ │
│ Phase 3: Synthesize & Plan → tasks.csv │
│ ├─ Read all explore findings → cross-reference │
│ ├─ Resolve conflicts between angles │
│ ├─ Decompose into execution tasks with context_from: E*;T* │
│ ├─ Compute dependency waves (topological sort) │
│ └─ ⛔ MANDATORY: User validates (skip ONLY if -y) │
│ │
│ Phase 4: Wave Execute (spawn_agents_on_csv) │
│ ├─ For each task wave: │
│ │ ├─ Build prev_context from explore.csv + tasks.csv │
│ │ ├─ Build wave CSV with prev_context column │
│ │ ├─ spawn_agents_on_csv(execute instruction template) │
│ │ └─ Merge results into tasks.csv │
│ └─ discoveries.ndjson carries across all waves │
│ │
│ Phase 5: Aggregate │
│ ├─ Export results.csv │
│ ├─ Generate context.md with all findings │
│ └─ Display summary │
│ │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 1,145 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 8596ebe8b9cd
workflow-lite-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow (2,133 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 10,820 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit
Audit local Claude Code transcript usage and summarize likely token hotspots. Use when the user asks where Claude Code tokens are going or wants evidence before optimizing.
optimize
Diagnose and reduce Claude Code token usage for a project or session using context hygiene, model and effort routing, MCP minimization, output trimming/sanitizing, subagent discipline, and measurement. Use when the user asks to lower Claude Code token usage, cost, context bloat, or usage-limit burn.
setup
Interactive or guided project setup for Claude Code token optimizer settings. Use when the user asks to install, configure, setup, enable hooks, or choose token-saving options interactively.
spawn-agent
Spawn worker agents (Gemini CLI or Codex CLI) to keep main context clean. Use for implementation, codebase research, context gathering, or any scoped work that would pollute the orchestrator's context.
newsroom-style
Apply AP Style and common newsroom conventions when writing or editing news articles, briefs, and headlines. Use when drafting publishable copy, editing contributor submissions, or converting informal notes into news-ready language.
beat-brief
Draft a short daily beat briefing from a folder of incoming source documents. Use when the reporter wants a five-bullet summary of the day's material with attribution flags and follow-up actions.