finalize-plan

A planning-review skill that checks whether a saved plan contains the decisions, file names, commands, and constraints needed to carry out the work later. It applies only while the assistant is in planning mode.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing plan files, identifying gaps in implementation instructions, and suggesting the specific details that should be added.
Why use it?
It catches missing details before implementation, so a fresh assistant context can follow the plan without relying on the earlier conversation.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/cblecker/claude-plugins/finalize-plan
Any agent
npx skills add cblecker/claude-plugins --skill finalize-plan
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cblecker/claude-plugins

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 40 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 318 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00040 $0.00318
Opus 5 $0.00020 $0.00159
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00064
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00032

Measured 2d ago against content hash 381ec65e1939, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

finalize-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plan-review/skills/finalize-plan/SKILL.md · 39 lines

What it actually says

Pre-flight: confirm plan mode

Check your system context for a "Plan mode is active" reminder. If you are not in plan mode, tell the user and stop — this skill only applies during planning.

Review the plan

Read the plan file (path is in the plan-mode system reminder).

Scan the conversation for details that a fresh context with only the plan file would need to faithfully execute the work. Focus on:

  • Decisions — choices the user made between alternatives
  • User corrections — anything the user said "no, do it this way" about
  • Specific names — files, functions, types, CLI flags, tools, or MCP resources the user referenced or you agreed to use
  • Commands — exact build/test/run commands the user specified
  • Constraints — ordering, compatibility, "don't touch X", style preferences

Skip anything a competent agent can rediscover from the codebase itself (line numbers, import paths, boilerplate structure, surrounding code context).

Report

If the plan already covers everything: say so in one sentence.

Otherwise list what's missing — brief bullets, each naming the gap and suggesting what to add. Then offer to update the plan file with the missing details.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 39 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 381ec65e1939

Subscribe to this mod's changes

finalize-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository cblecker/claude-plugins (5 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 318 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens