Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix/elixir-phoenix-observabilitynpx skills add ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix --skill elixir-phoenix-observabilitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenixWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix/elixir-phoenix-observability)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix/elixir-phoenix-observability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix/elixir-phoenix-observability.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00387 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00193 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
elixir-phoenix-observability scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Observability
Use when the user needs measurable system health and faster debugging in production.
When to Use
- Adding or auditing Telemetry instrumentation
- Defining service-level indicators and alerts
- Wiring OpenTelemetry traces across Phoenix/Ecto/Oban
- Improving log correlation for incidents
- Building dashboards for latency, throughput, and errors
Iron Laws
- Instrument user-impacting flows before adding low-value metrics.
- Every alert must map to an explicit operator action.
- Logs must be structured and scrubbed for secrets.
- Trace/span names must be stable and domain-oriented.
- Prefer a small reliable metric set over noisy dashboards.
Workflow
Step 1: Define Signals
For each critical flow, define:
- Latency (p50/p95/p99)
- Throughput (requests/jobs per minute)
- Error rate (and top failure classes)
- Saturation indicators (DB pool, queue depth, scheduler pressure)
Step 2: Instrument
Verify or add:
- Telemetry events at Phoenix and domain boundaries
- Ecto query timing visibility
- Oban queue and failure metrics
- End-to-end trace propagation where available
Step 3: Correlate
Ensure shared IDs across logs/metrics/traces for the same request or job.
Step 4: Alert and Dashboard
Create:
- Actionable alerts on user-facing SLO breaches
- Dashboard sections by surface (HTTP, LiveView, DB, jobs)
- Runbook pointers for each alert condition
Output Expectations
Return:
- Missing instrumentation by flow
- Proposed metrics and alert thresholds
- Dashboard layout recommendation
- Explicit implementation order
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 65 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 5aed245f51d6
elixir-phoenix-observability is a skill published in the GitHub repository ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 387 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ash-framework
Use this skill working with Ash Framework or any of its extensions. Always consult this when making any domain changes, features or fixes.
phoenix-framework
Use this skill working with Phoenix Framework. Consult this when working with the web layer, controllers, views, liveviews etc.
phoenix
Use when building an Elixir web app with Phoenix — contexts, Ecto schemas, changesets and migrations, LiveView, channels and PubSub, the generators, and the boundary between domain logic and the web layer. Covers the classic LiveView over-rendering and Ecto N+1 traps. NOT pure OTP work with no web or Ecto layer …
writing-review-packets
Create or revise Reviews packet markdown for a code diff, including section strategy, prose, hunk references, validation, and pushing packet revisions with the Reviews CLI. Use when the user asks to write a review packet, organize a diff for review, add prose around hunk refs, update a packet for a new patchset, or…
code-review
Review code changes for regressions, correctness, and missing tests.
using-reviews-locally
Run and use the Reviews app locally, including server startup, port checks, local token setup, CLI config, pushing local reviews or new patchsets, and Codex workflow conventions. Use when the user asks to spin up Reviews, push a local review packet or revision, mint/access local API tokens, debug localhost review…