elixir-phoenix-review

elixir-phoenix-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix. It costs 18 tokens per session (1,926 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review workflow for Elixir and Phoenix changes that uses specialist checks in parallel. It reports problems and explanations but does not create tasks or change the code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review changed files or focus on tests, security, Oban workers, deployment configuration, Iron Law violations, or a plan document.
Why use it?
It helps inspect different risk areas before a commit or pull request, including security, deployment settings, background workers, and project-specific rules.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: $ARGUMENTS substitution, but also agents/openai.yaml present. Also seen: mentions Codex.

Good fit Use it to review changed files or focus on tests, security, Oban workers, deployment configuration, Iron Law violations, or a plan document.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix/elixir-phoenix-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix --skill elixir-phoenix-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for elixir-phoenix-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix/elixir-phoenix-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix/elixir-phoenix-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix/elixir-phoenix-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix/elixir-phoenix-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for elixir-phoenix-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix/elixir-phoenix-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix/elixir-phoenix-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 18 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,926 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00018 $0.01926
Opus 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00770
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00385
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00193

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 513844e9ff44, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

elixir-phoenix-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/elixir-phoenix-review/SKILL.md · 169 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 169 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review Elixir/Phoenix Code

Review code by spawning parallel specialist agents. Find and explain issues — do NOT create tasks or fix anything.

Usage

`elixir-phoenix-review`                          # Review all changed files
`elixir-phoenix-review` test                     # Review test files only
`elixir-phoenix-review` security                 # Run security audit only
`elixir-phoenix-review` oban                     # Review Oban workers only
`elixir-phoenix-review` deploy                   # Validate deployment config
`elixir-phoenix-review` iron-laws                # Check Iron Law violations only
`elixir-phoenix-review` .codex/plans/auth/plan.md    # Review implementation of plan

Arguments

$ARGUMENTS = Focus area or path to plan file.

Workflow

Step 1: Identify Changed Files and Prepare Directories

CRITICAL: Create output dirs BEFORE spawning agents — agents cannot create directories and will fail repeatedly on writes.

Determine SLUG from the most recent plan directory (use rg --files on .codex/plans/*/), default to "review". Run mkdir -p ".codex/plans/${SLUG}/reviews" ".codex/plans/${SLUG}/summaries" and mkdir -p .codex/reviews.

Then run git diff --name-only HEAD~5 and git diff --name-only main to identify changed files. Save the diff base for pre-existing detection in Step 3b.

Step 1b: Load Plan Context (Scratchpad)

If reviewing a plan, read .codex/plans/${SLUG}/scratchpad.md for planning decisions, rationale, and handoff notes. Include relevant decisions in each agent's prompt so they have context about WHY code was written a certain way. This eliminates session archaeology.

Step 1c: Check Prior Reviews

If .codex/plans/${SLUG}/reviews/ has prior output, include consolidated summary in each agent's prompt as "PRIOR FINDINGS" with instruction: "Focus on NEW issues. Mark still-present issues as PERSISTENT."

Step 2: Create Task List and Spawn Review Agents (MANDATORY)

NEVER spawn the same agent role twice in one review. If reviewing a plan, scope ALL agents to the plan's changed files in a single pass. Do NOT run a scoped review followed by a broader review — one pass per role.

Read the full file on GitHub · 169 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 169 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 513844e9ff44

Subscribe to this mod's changes

elixir-phoenix-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix (11 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,926 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

writing-review-packets

Create or revise Reviews packet markdown for a code diff, including section strategy, prose, hunk references, validation, and pushing packet revisions with the Reviews CLI. Use when the user asks to write a review packet, organize a diff for review, add prose around hunk refs, update a packet for a new patchset, or…

figitaki/reviews · 82 tokens

using-reviews-locally

Run and use the Reviews app locally, including server startup, port checks, local token setup, CLI config, pushing local reviews or new patchsets, and Codex workflow conventions. Use when the user asks to spin up Reviews, push a local review packet or revision, mint/access local API tokens, debug localhost review…

figitaki/reviews · 82 tokens

reviews-overview

Explain the Reviews platform to a general agent: what Reviews provides, when to use it during human-in-the-loop or agent-driven development, how review packets structure a diff for humans, and how Reviews can precede public PR creation or integrate with other review processes. Use when an agent needs to decide whether…

figitaki/reviews · 85 tokens

elixir-review

Review Elixir/Phoenix code: OTP patterns, GenServer, LiveView, fault tolerance and concurrency.

camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkit · 25 tokens

oracle

Oracle second-model review: bundle prompts/files, debug, refactor, design.

steipete/oracle · 18 tokens

chrome-cdp

Drive a headless Chrome over the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP) for browser QA — navigate, click, fill forms, read the DOM/accessibility tree, screenshot, and assert. Use whenever a task requires loading a web page and interacting with it like a user. Chrome is launched by a bash step (recipe below); this skill…

mattzcarey/shippie · 91 tokens