Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix/elixir-phoenix-triagenpx skills add ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix --skill elixir-phoenix-triagegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenixWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix/elixir-phoenix-triage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix/elixir-phoenix-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix/elixir-phoenix-triage.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00941 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00470 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00188 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
elixir-phoenix-triage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Triage — Interactive Review Resolution
Walk through review findings one by one for human decision before committing to fixes.
Usage
`elixir-phoenix-triage` .codex/plans/user-auth/reviews/user-auth-review.md
`elixir-phoenix-triage` # Uses most recent review
Why Triage
After elixir-phoenix-review produces findings, you have three options:
- Fix everything — ``elixir-phoenix-plan
.codex/plans/{slug}/reviews/... - Triage first —
elixir-phoenix-triage(filter, then fix what matters) - Handle manually — Read review, pick what to fix yourself
Best when review has 5+ findings and you want to prioritize.
Workflow
Step 1: Load Review
Read the review file. Parse all findings with severity.
Auto-approve Iron Law violations: Findings matching the 13 Iron Laws are auto-approved as "Fix it" without asking. These are non-negotiable in Elixir/Phoenix development.
Step 2: Present ALL Findings for Batch Selection
Use ask the user directly with multiSelect: true. Start with
severity shortcuts, then list individual findings:
ask the user directly:
question: "Which findings do you want to fix? (Iron Law violations auto-included)"
header: "Triage"
multiSelect: true
options:
- label: "All BLOCKERs ({count})"
description: "Fix all critical issues"
- label: "All WARNINGs ({count})"
description: "Fix all should-fix issues"
- label: "[BLOCKER] {title 1}"
description: "{file}:{line} — {brief description}"
- label: "[WARNING] {title 2}"
description: "{file}:{line} — {brief description}"
If >4 options, batch into groups of 4 with severity shortcuts in the first batch. Severity shortcuts select all findings of that level — user can mix shortcuts with individual picks.
Step 3: Gather Context on Selected Items
For selected items, ask ONE batch follow-up: "Any specific approach for any of these?" If they say "just fix them", proceed.
Step 4: Generate Triage Summary
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 110 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 5e6884b51e9f
elixir-phoenix-triage is a skill published in the GitHub repository ccarvalho-eng/codex-elixir-phoenix (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 941 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
elixir-expert
Expert-level Elixir, Phoenix, OTP, and concurrent systems. Use when the user mentions Phoenix, OTP, Erlang, concurrent, or functional, or when the task involves Elixir Fundamentals or Phoenix Framework.
ash-framework
Use this skill working with Ash Framework or any of its extensions. Always consult this when making any domain changes, features or fixes.
phoenix-framework
Use this skill working with Phoenix Framework. Consult this when working with the web layer, controllers, views, liveviews etc.
phoenix
Use when building an Elixir web app with Phoenix — contexts, Ecto schemas, changesets and migrations, LiveView, channels and PubSub, the generators, and the boundary between domain logic and the web layer. Covers the classic LiveView over-rendering and Ecto N+1 traps. NOT pure OTP work with no web or Ecto layer …
writing-review-packets
Create or revise Reviews packet markdown for a code diff, including section strategy, prose, hunk references, validation, and pushing packet revisions with the Reviews CLI. Use when the user asks to write a review packet, organize a diff for review, add prose around hunk refs, update a packet for a new patchset, or…
using-reviews-locally
Run and use the Reviews app locally, including server startup, port checks, local token setup, CLI config, pushing local reviews or new patchsets, and Codex workflow conventions. Use when the user asks to spin up Reviews, push a local review packet or revision, mint/access local API tokens, debug localhost review…