formal-verification

formal-verification is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ccashwell/evm-cortex. It costs 40 tokens per session (1,403 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide to formally checking whether Solidity contracts obey stated rules using Certora CVL or Halmos. Formal verification examines many possible inputs and execution paths instead of only selected test cases.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to write specifications, verification rules, symbolic tests, hooks, ghost variables, and summaries for external contract calls.
Why use it?
It can reveal behavior that ordinary tests miss by checking contract properties across broad or symbolic input spaces. It helps verify rules about balances, deposits, withdrawals, and other invariants.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is import {Vault} from "../src/Vault.sol";.

Good fit Use it to write specifications, verification rules, symbolic tests, hooks, ghost variables, and summaries for external contract calls.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ccashwell/evm-cortex
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ccashwell/evm-cortex/formal-verification

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for formal-verification

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ccashwell/evm-cortex/formal-verification/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccashwell/evm-cortex/formal-verification)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccashwell/evm-cortex/formal-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ccashwell/evm-cortex/formal-verification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for formal-verification

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccashwell/evm-cortex/formal-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ccashwell/evm-cortex/formal-verification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 40 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,403 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00040 $0.01403
Opus 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00561
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00281
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00140

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 397af5aeed50, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

formal-verification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/formal-verification/SKILL.md · 220 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 220 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Formal Verification for Solidity

Tools

Tool Approach Strengths
Certora Prover CVL specs + SMT solving Industry standard, deep analysis
Halmos Symbolic Foundry tests Familiar Foundry interface, open source
KEVM K Framework semantics EVM bytecode level verification

Certora CVL Specification Template

// spec/Vault.spec

using ERC20 as token;

methods {
    function deposit(uint256) external returns (uint256);
    function withdraw(uint256, address, address) external returns (uint256);
    function totalAssets() external returns (uint256) envfree;
    function totalSupply() external returns (uint256) envfree;
    function balanceOf(address) external returns (uint256) envfree;
    function asset() external returns (address) envfree;

    // Summarize external calls
    function _.transfer(address, uint256) external => DISPATCHER(true);
    function _.transferFrom(address, address, uint256) external => DISPATCHER(true);
    function _.balanceOf(address) external => DISPATCHER(true);
}

Rule Types

Parametric Rules

Verify properties for all possible inputs:

// Depositing should increase total supply
rule depositIncreasesSupply(uint256 assets) {
    env e;
    uint256 supplyBefore = totalSupply();

    deposit(e, assets);

    uint256 supplyAfter = totalSupply();
    assert supplyAfter >= supplyBefore, "supply must not decrease on deposit";
}

Invariant Rules

Properties that must hold in every reachable state:

// Solvency: vault always has enough assets to back shares
invariant solvency()
    totalSupply() == 0 || totalAssets() > 0
    {
        preserved deposit(uint256 assets) with (env e) {
            require assets > 0;
        }
    }

Relational Rules

Compare two executions:

// Monotonicity: depositing more gives more shares
rule depositMonotonicity(uint256 assets1, uint256 assets2) {
    env e;
    require assets1 < assets2;

    storage init = lastStorage;

    uint256 shares1 = deposit(e, assets1);

    uint256 shares2 = deposit(e, assets2) at init;

    assert shares2 >= shares1, "more assets should give more shares";
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 220 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 220 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 397af5aeed50

Subscribe to this mod's changes

formal-verification is a skill published in the GitHub repository ccashwell/evm-cortex (131 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,403 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

web3-testing

Test smart contracts comprehensively using Hardhat and Foundry with unit tests, integration tests, and mainnet forking. Use when testing Solidity contracts, setting up blockchain test suites, or validating DeFi protocols.

wshobson/agents · 46 tokens

building-pydantic-ai-agents

Build AI agents with Pydantic AI — tools, capabilities (including on-demand loading), workspaces, structured output, streaming, testing, and multi-agent patterns. Use when the user mentions Pydantic AI, imports pydanticai, or asks to build an AI agent, add tools/capabilities, attach a workspace, defer capability…

pydantic/pydantic-ai · 92 tokens

prompt-proximity-architecture

Turn an approved measurement charter, ICPs, and buyer jobs into a budget-aware prompt coverage blueprint across proximity bands, aided status, information acts, journey states, roles, locales, evidence grades, partitions, and measurement lanes. Use before prompt wording to define required, optional, and prohibited…

elvisun/newsjack · 67 tokens

fizz

Generate Echidna/Medusa-compatible Solidity fuzz suites from Foundry or Hardhat projects. Trigger on "fizz", "generate fuzz suite", "build fuzz harness", "stateful fuzzing", "fuzzing harness", "property testing", and "invariant suite".

pashov/skills · 60 tokens

foundry-testing

Write and debug Foundry tests and Solidity scripts. Use when writing unit, fuzz, fork, or invariant tests, writing bulloak BTT .tree specs (Branching Tree Technique), using cheatcodes, benchmarking gas, measuring coverage, writing deploy scripts, or working in tests/ or script/.

PaulRBerg/foundry-template · 64 tokens

software-test-creation

Write failing tests for a TDD slice based on acceptance criteria and codebase conventions. Use when the "red" phase of red-green-refactor requires tests that define expected behavior before implementation exists. Discovers codebase test conventions first, writes test files that compile or parse but fail because the…

stencila/stencila · 82 tokens