briefbound-autonomous-collaboration-loop

briefbound-autonomous-collaboration-loop is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from CCDawn/codex-skills. It costs 74 tokens per session (2,098 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A project workflow for coordinating several independent coding-agent conversations toward a shared local result. It can track tasks, recover coordination problems, verify work, integrate changes into the local main branch, and clean up.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for opted-in multi-agent development involving task coordination, conflict recovery, local integration, verification, and cleanup.
Why use it?
It reduces repeated manual checkpoints when multiple agents are working on related tasks. Each agent keeps its own task and branch while the workflow manages the overall handoff.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: shipped in a Claude Code plugin, but also agents/openai.yaml present. Also seen: mentions subagents; mentions Codex.

Part of the briefbound-skills plugin — 30 skills shipped together

Good fit It is for opted-in multi-agent development involving task coordination, conflict recovery, local integration, verification, and cleanup.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-autonomous-collaboration-loop
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add CCDawn/codex-skills --skill briefbound-autonomous-collaboration-loop
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CCDawn/codex-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install briefbound-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 30 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for briefbound-autonomous-collaboration-loop

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-autonomous-collaboration-loop/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-autonomous-collaboration-loop)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-autonomous-collaboration-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-autonomous-collaboration-loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for briefbound-autonomous-collaboration-loop

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-autonomous-collaboration-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-autonomous-collaboration-loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 74 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,098 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00074 $0.02098
Opus 5 $0.00037 $0.01049
Sonnet 5 $0.00015 $0.00420
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00210

Measured 8d ago against content hash ff878446d4f7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

briefbound-autonomous-collaboration-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/engineering/briefbound-autonomous-collaboration-loop/SKILL.md · 101 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Briefbound 自动协作开发闭环

目标

用户确认一次后,驱动同项目平级会话完成各自任务、恢复冲突、验证并合入本地 main。不创建主从团队或接管其他任务。

Briefbound task contract

  • Context Boundary: 已对齐的共同目标、用户一次性授权、现有同项目 thread、各自任务/branch/worktree/scope、共享契约、目标 main 和验证门。
  • Output Contract: collaboration agreement、可接管状态、各任务交付证据、integration queue、本地 main 验证、恢复与清理闭环。
  • Allowed Action: 在授权范围内读取/发送 thread 消息、维护 registry、执行本地写入/提交/合入 main、验证和安全清理;新建会话、远程 push/PR merge/发布、破坏性或高风险动作仍需单独授权。
  • Success Evidence: 每个原任务达到验收,目标 main 包含预期交付,集成门通过,open coordination、恢复债务和已知开发残留清零。
  • Stop Condition: 未获开启确认、共同目标或 target 不明、产品/安全/数据迁移取舍未决、需要远程授权、破坏性动作,或自动恢复连续失败。
  • Route Out: 各 Agent 原 owner、briefbound-multi-agent-orchestrationbriefbound-thread-coordinationbriefbound-pr-reviewbriefbound-development-cleanupbriefbound-project-memorybriefbound-router 或 BLOCKED。

统一调用契约

  • 用户可见内容默认中文;只报行动决定、blocker 和最终证据。Route Out 仅以 Briefbound task contract 为准;末行写 下一步建议: <一个具体动作>
  • 各 Agent 保留自己的任务、scope、branch 和完成责任;Loop Owner 只维护闭环,不成为其他任务的 owner。
  • 开启后不在每个阶段、task、普通冲突或恢复动作后询问是否继续。

开启与授权

Briefbound Router 仅在非简单目标确有多会话协作价值时询问一次:“是否开启自动化协作开发闭环?”确认后持续授权联系现有会话、协商、安全开发、本地提交与 main 集成、验证和清理,直到完成、取消或自然闸门。

没有合适会话时,只询问一次是否创建。远程 push、PR 或破坏性操作不继承授权。

角色与持久状态

  • Loop Owner:维护状态、租约、outbox、恢复债务和完成门,不代写 peer 结论。
  • Peer Owner:完成任务,提供 scope、依赖和 MERGE_READY
  • Integration Owner:由任一合格 peer 在首个 MERGE_READY 出现后主动原子认领,维护当前队列、按依赖重验并合入 main;claim 有效期间不启动新的无关实现任务,变忙时先转交队列。
  • Recovery Dispatcher:任何活跃参与者在 Loop Owner 租约过期时可 takeover,继承 outbox、恢复和集成义务,但不能继承或伪造 peer 的完成声明。

状态为 DISCOVER -> AGREEMENT -> RUNNING/NEGOTIATING -> MERGE_READY -> INTEGRATING -> INTEGRATED -> CLOSED。每个 peer 只记 Task / Scope / Branch or Worktree / Dependency / Checkpoint / Tests / Blocker / Resume Debt;优先 registry,跨会话恢复才用 memory。

自动循环

1. 发现与约定

只读最多 3 个相关 thread,确认收益、边界、契约、依赖和 Integration Target,用 briefbound-multi-agent-orchestration 建 agreement。Integration Owner 可等首个交付入队后认领;无收益则返回原 owner。

2. 并行推进

各 peer 继续非冲突任务,只在契约变化、依赖就绪、可行动证据、纠错、blocker 或 MERGE_READY 时通信;不轮询。消息默认只发差量:From/Task / Changed Fact / Action Impact / Evidence Pointer / Reply Needed;背景、方案和测试用指针,首次契约或安全语义才展开。

Read the full file on GitHub · 101 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 101 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A ff878446d4f7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

briefbound-autonomous-collaboration-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository CCDawn/codex-skills (4 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 2,098 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.