Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-evaluationnpx skills add CCDawn/codex-skills --skill briefbound-evaluationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CCDawn/codex-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-evaluation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-evaluation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00685 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00342 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00137 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
briefbound-evaluation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Briefbound Evaluation
目标
评价方案、流程、skill、输出质量、合理性、灵活性或下一步价值。只在没有更具体 owner 时使用；不重复 PR、项目、bug、复用研究或 planning 流程。
Briefbound task contract
- Context Boundary: 被评价对象、用户标准、证据来源、允许动作和已排除的专项 owner。
- Output Contract: 简洁判断、1-3 个会改变行动的依据或建议和 Route Out。
- Allowed Action: 只读评价；用户要求优化时路由最具体执行 owner，不在评价过程中顺手修改。
- Success Evidence: 判断绑定具体对象、证据、影响和可验证下一步。
- Stop Condition: 对象/目标不明、存在更具体 owner、关键证据缺失、实施越界或高风险取舍未确认。
- Route Out: 更具体 owner、
briefbound-router、briefbound-planning、FAST_PATH、briefbound-completion-summary或 BLOCKED。
统一调用契约
- 只处理 Briefbound task contract 范围；不匹配时回
briefbound-router或更具体 owner，复合任务不吞其他 owner。 - 用户可见内容默认中文；保留技术字面量；只报结论、证据、风险和产出；Route Out 仅以 Briefbound task contract 为准，末行写
下一步建议: <一个具体动作>。
评价方法
- 先内部确认没有更具体 owner；无需向用户输出“复用检查”。
- 只选会改变结论或下一动作的维度；证据已足够时停止，不固定遍历完整质量清单。
- 每个判断给最短证据、影响和最小有效改进，不用“更完善/更灵活”等空话。
- 最多给 3 个建议，按依赖、ROI 和误改风险排序；其余只在用户要求完整审计时展开。
- 用户已要求“继续/优化/修复”时，立即路由最具体执行 owner，并沿已授权范围连续推进；评价 skill 本身不再复制执行流程。
内部可以多视角自审，但没有 finding 不展示矩阵，也不输出固定角色、严重度体系或 SAFE_DIRECT/PLAN_THEN_EXECUTE 分类。
输出
评估结论: GOOD / ACCEPTABLE_WITH_RISK / NEEDS_CHANGE / BLOCKED
关键依据: <只保留会改变结论的证据>
建议（0-3 项）:
1. <最小动作>；原因；完成条件
剩余风险: ...
下一步建议: <一个具体动作>
评价对象不清时回 Briefbound Router 对齐；评价变成项目/PR/bug/复用专项时立即 Route Out，不在本 skill 扩写对应流程。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 49 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 95d9420c6d09
briefbound-evaluation is a skill published in the GitHub repository CCDawn/codex-skills (4 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 685 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
chinese-git-workflow
国内 Git 平台配置参考——Gitee、Coding.net、极狐 GitLab、CNB 的 SSH/HTTPS/凭据/CI 接入差异与镜像同步配置。仅在用户显式 /chinese-git-workflow 时调用，不要根据上下文自动触发。.
chinese-code-review
中文 review 沟通参考——话术模板、分级标注（必须修复/建议修改/仅供参考）、国内团队常见反模式应对。仅在用户显式 /chinese-code-review 时调用，不要根据上下文自动触发。.
chinese-commit-conventions
中文 commit 与 changelog 配置参考——Conventional Commits 中文适配、commitlint/husky/commitizen 中文模板、conventional-changelog 中文配置。仅在用户显式 /chinese-commit-conventions 时调用，不要根据上下文自动触发。.
chinese-documentation
中文文档排版参考——中英文空格、全半角标点、术语保留、链接格式、中文文案排版指北约定。仅在用户显式 /chinese-documentation 时调用，不要根据上下文自动触发。.
systematic-debugging
Skill "systematic-debugging" from jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh, covering 系统化调试, 概述, 铁律, 何时使用 and 四个阶段.
mcp-builder
MCP 服务器构建方法论 — 系统化构建生产级 MCP 工具，让 AI 助手连接外部能力.