Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add CCDawn/codex-skills --skill briefbound-multi-agent-orchestrationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CCDawn/codex-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-multi-agent-orchestration)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-multi-agent-orchestration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-multi-agent-orchestration/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-multi-agent-orchestration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-multi-agent-orchestration.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.01672 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00836 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00334 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00167 |
Grade A, and why
briefbound-multi-agent-orchestration scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Briefbound Peer-Agent Collaboration
目标
让同项目的平级会话 Agent 各自完成原任务,同时通过最少必要协商减少重复劳动、修改冲突、过期结论和集成返工。编排对象是协作过程,不是其他 Agent。
Briefbound task contract
- Context Boundary: 已对齐意图、现有独立 thread、各自任务/scope/branch、共享契约、依赖、冲突和集成目标。
- Output Contract: peer agreement、责任边界、共享决定、依赖交付、集成证据和各自任务状态。
- Allowed Action: 读取/发送 thread 消息、使用现有 registry、协商和执行已授权的本地集成;不得替对方改任务状态,新建会话、远程 Git、发布和破坏性动作需授权。
- Success Evidence: 每个 Agent 的原任务保持 owner、共享边界无矛盾、重复工作被消除、目标分支验证通过且恢复债务清零。
- Stop Condition: 意图未对齐、不是同项目、缺少有效 thread、协作成本不低于收益、责任争议、高风险取舍或权限不足。
- Route Out: 各 Agent 原 owner、
briefbound-autonomous-collaboration-loop、briefbound-thread-coordination、briefbound-pr-review、briefbound-development-cleanup、briefbound-router或 BLOCKED。
统一调用契约
- 所有 Agent 平级且保留原任务、写入许可、branch 和完成责任;没有主从、派发或隐式任务转移。
- 用户可见内容默认中文,只报改变行动的共同决定、依赖、风险和集成证据。Route Out 仅以 Briefbound task contract 为准;末行写
下一步建议: <一个具体动作>。 - 协作必须改善至少一个本地任务且不损害其他任务,或降低共享项目的冲突/回归;否则静默返回各自工作。
进入闸门
Briefbound Router 已完成意图对齐和有界发现,以 PEER_COLLABORATION_READY 交接;本轮具有原生 thread read/send 能力,并且至少两个现有独立会话存在真实互补、依赖、重叠或共同集成面。
简单任务、仅目录相似、无共享决定、同一小文件无法并行,或消息/合并成本高于预期收益时不进入。一次建议、状态交换或单一冲突只用 briefbound-thread-coordination。
本 skill 维护平级协作协议,不负责持续驱动。用户已确认自动推进所有 peer、恢复冲突并合入本地 main 时,以 briefbound-autonomous-collaboration-loop 为 primary,本 skill 只提供 agreement 支持。
平级协作循环
1. 建立各自与共同事实
读取每个候选的 Task / Desired Outcome / Scope / Branch or Worktree / Checkpoint / Blocker / Success Evidence。区分:各自独占面、共享契约、依赖交付和集成面。代码、Git 和运行证据优先于消息或 registry。
2. 提出协作而非派发
任何 Agent 都可提出 COLLABORATION_PROPOSAL,但不能改变对方任务。对方以 PEER_ACCEPT / PEER_ADAPT / PEER_DECLINE 自主决定。只有接受后才形成 agreement;需要消息结构时读取 references/team-protocol.md。
agreement 只记录 Peer Tasks / Shared Surface / Each Scope / Dependency / Integration Target / Current Integration Claim / Evidence / Exit Condition。Coordination Owner 仅维护共同决定,Integration Owner 仅负责合入验证,均不拥有其他 Agent。开始协作时可以没有 Integration Owner。
使用一次 registry claim 原子占用 lane=collaboration/<topic-key>,并加入相关 thread/<agent-id> 与共享 surface,防止重复提议;拒绝、过期或结束后释放。每个 Agent 继续自己的非冲突工作,不等待可选协作。
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 78 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 108e85085de5
briefbound-multi-agent-orchestration is a skill published in the GitHub repository CCDawn/codex-skills (4 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 1,672 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
chinese-git-workflow
A reference for configuring Git with Chinese code-hosting services such as Gitee, Coding.net, GitLab China, and CNB, including SSH, HTTPS, credentials, CI, and repository mirroring.
chinese-commit-conventions
A Chinese-language guide to Conventional Commits, a format for writing consistent Git commit messages, plus related changelog, commit-checking, and commit-helper configuration.
chinese-documentation
A Chinese technical-documentation style guide covering spacing, punctuation, numbers, terminology, and links when Chinese and English appear together.
systematic-debugging
A step-by-step method for finding the underlying cause of technical problems before changing code. It covers reading errors, reproducing failures, checking recent changes, and tracing data across system components.
chinese-code-review
A Chinese-language code-review communication guide with templates and severity levels for review comments.
mcp-builder
A guide to building Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, which let AI assistants use tools and read external data. It covers server structure, tool design, testing, and deployment in TypeScript and Python.