Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add CCDawn/codex-skills --skill briefbound-simplification-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CCDawn/codex-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-simplification-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-simplification-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-simplification-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-simplification-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ccdawn/codex-skills/briefbound-simplification-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.00883 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00441 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00177 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
briefbound-simplification-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Briefbound 精简审查
目标
只读审查当前变更中的非必要复杂度，给出有证据、可执行的删减建议。它补充正确性审查，不替代 briefbound-pr-review。
Briefbound task contract
- Context Boundary: 当前 diff/PR/base-head、已对齐需求、必要兼容与安全约束、明确排除范围。
- Output Contract: 按收益排序的精简 findings、保留理由、与正确性审查的组合路由。
- Allowed Action: 只读；不修改文件、不移动 HEAD、不改 index、不合并或推送。
- Success Evidence: 每条 finding 都绑定文件/行号或 diff 证据，且说明删除或替代后如何保持行为。
- Stop Condition: 没有可审 diff、需求边界不明、建议会改变用户行为、或发现问题主要属于正确性/安全/性能。
- Route Out:
briefbound-pr-review、briefbound-performance-engineering、对应开发 owner、briefbound-planning、briefbound-router或 BLOCKED。
统一调用契约
- 只处理 Briefbound task contract 范围；不匹配时回
briefbound-router或更具体 owner，复合任务不吞其他 owner。 - 用户可见内容默认中文，完成只报状态、产出、证据和剩余风险；代码、命令、路径、错误原文、API/协议、skill 名和枚举保留原样；Route Out 仅以 Briefbound task contract 为准，末行写
下一步建议: <一个具体动作>。
审查规则
- 先读需求和 diff，只检查本次新增或改动造成的复杂度。
- 优先寻找：可删除代码、标准库/平台原生替代、单实现抽象、单调用转发层、无人使用的配置能力、重复逻辑和不必要依赖。
- 只报告净收益明确且不会破坏已确认行为、信任边界、无障碍、兼容、迁移、恢复或必要测试的项。
- 不为减少行数牺牲可读性、错误处理、类型约束或真实扩展需求；无法证明时写“保留”，不要强行给 finding。
- 正确性、安全或需求偏离交
briefbound-pr-review；需实测的性能问题交briefbound-performance-engineering。两类问题可组合，不互相替代。
标签：删除、标准库、原生能力、暂不需要、收缩。
输出
默认中文，先 findings 后结论：
精简审查:
- 结论: LEAN / CUTS_AVAILABLE / BLOCKED
- 范围: ...
Findings:
- [标签] [文件:行] 删减对象；替代方式；行为保持证据；预计收益。
保留项:
- 看似复杂但必须保留的约束及证据。
组合路由:
- 正确性/安全问题 -> briefbound-pr-review
- 性能测量 -> briefbound-performance-engineering
- 可直接精简 -> 对应开发 owner
下一步建议: <一个具体动作>
只有实际测量时才给精确净减行数或依赖数；否则使用区间或定性收益。没有可删项时明确说明当前变更已经足够精简。
本 skill 的复杂度视角借鉴 Ponytail（MIT），并按 Briefbound 的中文输出、证据和 owner 契约重新组织。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 63 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 3fae92393769
briefbound-simplification-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository CCDawn/codex-skills (4 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 883 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
chinese-code-review
A Chinese-language code-review communication guide with templates and severity levels for review comments.
receiving-code-review
A guide for handling code-review feedback carefully. Code review is the process of checking proposed changes before they are accepted into a project.
requesting-code-review
A code-review procedure for checking completed work against its requirements before it spreads or is merged. A code reviewer is a person or agent who looks for defects and missing parts.
legacy-safe-edit
A set of practices for changing existing or old codebases safely. It focuses on finding dependencies, following local coding conventions, and making small changes that can be checked and reverted.
security-review
A code-security review guide covering common risks such as injection, weak login protection, unauthorized access, and sensitive-data exposure. It is written in Chinese and includes rules and examples for safer code.
code-review-self
A self-review checklist for checking code before committing it or opening a pull request, which is a request for teammates to review proposed changes.