Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ccoalm/ccl-skills --skill feature-risk-routergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ccoalm/ccl-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccoalm/ccl-skills/feature-risk-router)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccoalm/ccl-skills/feature-risk-router"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ccoalm/ccl-skills/feature-risk-router/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ccoalm/ccl-skills/feature-risk-router"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ccoalm/ccl-skills/feature-risk-router.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00099 | $0.02837 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00049 | $0.01418 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00567 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00284 |
Grade A, and why
feature-risk-router scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Feature Risk Router
Use this lightweight router before or during product delivery when the required rigor is unclear. It classifies risk and names the gates that must run; it does not replace product-rd-workflow, testing-strategy, product-ui-ux-design, stack-specific development skills, review skills, or release workflows.
Objective high-risk change-shapes force classification even when the change feels trivial — a low-risk intuition is not a substitute for running the tags. The "when rigor is unclear" entry is not a licence to skip the router because you judged a change low-risk: the tags below classify well once you are here; the failure mode is never arriving because you felt sure. So regardless of that intuition, if the change deletes / backfills / migrates data or is otherwise irreversible, touches authentication / authorization / roles / tenant isolation, handles secrets / credentials / tokens, moves money or billing / quota, alters an external-facing or service-client API contract, changes a trust boundary or an untrusted-input sink, drives a production rollout / flag, or changes a shared deterministic gate / validator / CI harness / merge-readiness or completion-status rule (which can look docs/scripts-only yet decide future merge and completion semantics), run the classification FIRST and only then conclude low-risk if the relevant tags (write-finality, data-migration, permission-access, security-review, api-contract, money-quota, release-ops, shared-gate, ai-action) actually clear. Self-de-escalating one of those change-shapes to "not needed" without running its tag is the miss this prevents.
- Tone and diff size are not classification inputs: a reporter's urgent tone or executive pressure must never escalate a change's tags, and a small diff must never de-escalate them — tags run on the change's objective shape (production impact, frequency, money/data finality, workaround availability, rollback difficulty, verification sufficiency). (The always-on routing layer and
product-rd-workflowowner-dispatch are the backstops for the case where the router is never invoked at all — this clause governs the case where you are deciding whether it applies.)
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · +2 lines a60b3c557274
- 11d ago First seen · 70 lines · 99 tokens per session scan A f8b1a265dff0
feature-risk-router is a skill published in the GitHub repository ccoalm/ccl-skills (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 99 tokens to every session and 2,837 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
mle-workflow
Production machine-learning engineering workflow for data contracts, reproducible training, model evaluation, deployment, monitoring, and rollback. Use when building, reviewing, or hardening ML systems beyond one-off notebooks.
autonomous-loops
Patterns and architectures for autonomous Claude Code loops — from simple sequential pipelines to RFC-driven multi-agent DAG systems.
react-patterns
React 18/19 patterns including hooks discipline, server/client component boundaries, Suspense + error boundaries, form actions, data fetching, state management decision trees, and accessibility-first composition. Use when writing or reviewing React components.
article-writing
Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter.
security-review
Perform a focused security review of pending git changes to identify high-confidence security vulnerabilities with real exploitation potential. Use this skill when the user asks for a security review, security audit, vulnerability scan, or wants to check pending changes on a branch for security issues before merging.…
huggingface-llm-trainer
Train or fine-tune language models with TRL or Unsloth on Hugging Face Jobs, including SFT, DPO, GRPO, reward models, and GGUF conversion. Use for cloud LLM training; use huggingface-vision-trainer for vision tasks.