Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/cdeust/cortex/cortex-recallnpx skills add cdeust/Cortex --skill cortex-recallgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cdeust/CortexWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00094 | $0.00842 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00047 | $0.00421 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00168 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
cortex-recall scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 90 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Recall — Retrieve from Persistent Memory
Keywords
recall, remember, search, find, what did we, do you remember, what was, have we seen, look up, retrieve, past decision, previous fix, history, what do we know, search memory, find memory, related memories
Overview
Retrieve relevant memories using Cortex's 6-signal WRRF (Weighted Reciprocal Rank Fusion) retrieval engine. The system automatically classifies your query intent and adjusts retrieval weights — semantic queries emphasize vector similarity, temporal queries emphasize recency, causal queries traverse the knowledge graph.
Use this skill when: You need context about past work, decisions, patterns, or fixes. Also use proactively when starting work on a topic that likely has stored context.
Workflow
Step 1: Formulate the Query
Write a natural language query. The intent classifier handles routing:
- Semantic: "How does the authentication system work?"
- Temporal: "What did we work on last week?"
- Causal: "What caused the deployment failure?"
- Entity: "Everything about PostgreSQL in this project"
- Multi-hop: "How does the memory gate relate to consolidation?"
Step 2: Basic Recall
cortex:recall({
"query": "<natural language question or topic>",
"limit": 10
})
Optional filters:
"domain": Filter to specific project domain"tags": Filter by tags (e.g.["bug-fix", "authentication"])"min_heat": Only hot/active memories (0.0-1.0)"time_range": Temporal filter (e.g."last_7_days","last_30_days")"store_type":"episodic"(specific events) or"semantic"(consolidated knowledge)
Step 3: Hierarchical Recall (For Broad Topics)
When exploring a large topic area, use fractal hierarchical recall:
cortex:recall_hierarchical({
"query": "<broad topic>",
"levels": 3
})
This returns memories organized in L0 (broad clusters) > L1 (sub-topics) > L2 (specific memories). Use cortex:drill_down to navigate deeper into any cluster.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 90 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A 850705cc79bd
cortex-recall is a skill published in the GitHub repository cdeust/Cortex (71 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 842 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
food-order
Reorder previous Foodora orders, preview cart contents, and track delivery ETA/status with ordercli. Use when the user wants to reorder food, check delivery status, or browse recent Foodora order history. Never confirm an order without explicit user approval.
opik-diagnose
Surface the Opik traces worth a developer's attention, ranked by signal — errors, failed tool calls, latency, regressions, and low online-eval scores — plus Diagnostics issues. Reads live/production traces via the SDK (searchtraces and agentinsights) and works with no MCP; uses the MCP issue entity when connected.…
genesis-development
This skill should be used when developing, debugging, refactoring, or building Genesis itself — tasks like "fix this in Genesis", "add a new MCP tool", "wire up the runtime", "Genesis won't start", "create a worktree", "debug the bridge", or "add a capability". Applies to any task modifying files under src/, .claude/…
client-scripts
Write ServiceNow client scripts (onLoad/onChange/onSubmit/onCellEdit) using gform, guser, GlideAjax, field visibility/mandatory toggles, and validation with debounced server calls.
agoragentic-transaction-assurance
Prepare, evaluate, and reconcile autonomous agent transactions without self-granting payment or owner authority. Use when an agent must bind principal authority, seller terms, payment evidence, execution, delivered outcome, and reconciliation; handle paid retries safely; or prepare an authority request for owner…
linkding
Manage bookmarks with Linkding. Use when the user asks to "save a bookmark", "add link", "search bookmarks", "list my bookmarks", "find saved links", "tag a bookmark", "archive bookmark", "check if URL is saved", "list tags", "create bundle", or mentions Linkding bookmark management.