Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ceilf6/frontagent/gitnexus-debuggingnpx skills add ceilf6/FrontAgent --skill gitnexus-debugginggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ceilf6/FrontAgentWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00757 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00378 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00151 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
gitnexus-debugging scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
81% identical to gitnexus-debugging — 42 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 90 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Debugging with GitNexus
When to Use
- "Why is this function failing?"
- "Trace where this error comes from"
- "Who calls this method?"
- "This endpoint returns 500"
- Investigating bugs, errors, or unexpected behavior
Workflow
1. gitnexus_query({query: "<error or symptom>"}) → Find related execution flows
2. gitnexus_context({name: "<suspect>"}) → See callers/callees/processes
3. READ gitnexus://repo/{name}/process/{name} → Trace execution flow
4. gitnexus_cypher({query: "MATCH path..."}) → Custom traces if needed
If "Index is stale" → run
npx gitnexus analyzein terminal.
Checklist
- [ ] Understand the symptom (error message, unexpected behavior)
- [ ] gitnexus_query for error text or related code
- [ ] Identify the suspect function from returned processes
- [ ] gitnexus_context to see callers and callees
- [ ] Trace execution flow via process resource if applicable
- [ ] gitnexus_cypher for custom call chain traces if needed
- [ ] Read source files to confirm root cause
Debugging Patterns
| Symptom | GitNexus Approach |
|---|---|
| Error message | gitnexus_query for error text → context on throw sites |
| Wrong return value | context on the function → trace callees for data flow |
| Intermittent failure | context → look for external calls, async deps |
| Performance issue | context → find symbols with many callers (hot paths) |
| Recent regression | detect_changes to see what your changes affect |
Tools
gitnexus_query — find code related to error:
gitnexus_query({query: "payment validation error"})
→ Processes: CheckoutFlow, ErrorHandling
→ Symbols: validatePayment, handlePaymentError, PaymentException
gitnexus_context — full context for a suspect:
gitnexus_context({name: "validatePayment"})
→ Incoming calls: processCheckout, webhookHandler
→ Outgoing calls: verifyCard, fetchRates (external API!)
→ Processes: CheckoutFlow (step 3/7)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 90 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 4a1e82aa835c
gitnexus-debugging is a skill published in the GitHub repository ceilf6/FrontAgent (117 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 757 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 81% identical to gitnexus-debugging, differing in 42 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
maintain-model-list
Maintain the supported LLM model list: add a new model, or run routine maintenance to verify availability and discover new models worth adding. Use when the user asks to add/support a model, update the model list, or check model availability.
update-changelog
Update docs/CHANGELOG.md from git history, GitHub releases, and code diffs. Use when: writing release notes, syncing the latest changelog entry, summarizing a new tag, or keeping changelog wording concise and consistent.
git-cleanup
Clean up local git branches and remotes accumulated from PR reviews. Use when the user asks to clean branches, remove stale remotes, or tidy up the local git state.
submit-pr-from-current-changes
Create a branch, commit existing local changes, push them, and open a pull request. Use when submitting current work as a PR.
pre-impl-discussion
Conduct a thorough pre-implementation discussion before making significant changes. Use when the user wants to discuss, plan, or evaluate a change before implementing it — especially when they say words like 'discuss', 'evaluate', 'plan', or 'let's talk about'.
agent-spec-tool-first
CRITICAL: Use for agent-spec CLI tool workflow. Triggers on: agent-spec, contract, lifecycle, guard, verify, explain, stamp, checkpoint, plan, requirements, work-units, knowledge requirements, KLL, docs vs knowledge, spec verification, task contract, spec quality, lint spec, run log, "how to verify", "how to use…