Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cekura-ai/cekura-skills --skill cekura-flag-call-log-failuresgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cekura-ai/cekura-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cekura-ai/cekura-skills/cekura-flag-call-log-failures)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cekura-ai/cekura-skills/cekura-flag-call-log-failures"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cekura-ai/cekura-skills/cekura-flag-call-log-failures/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cekura-ai/cekura-skills/cekura-flag-call-log-failures"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cekura-ai/cekura-skills/cekura-flag-call-log-failures.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00229 | $0.03608 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00114 | $0.01804 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00722 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00361 |
Grade A, and why
cekura-flag-call-log-failures scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 227 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
flag-call-log-failures
Go through an agent's recent production call logs and produce three things:
- Flagged calls — the call IDs that hit each specified KPI/issue/goal failure, with verbatim evidence.
- Failure rates — what percentage of all reviewed call logs each failure represents.
- Outcome distribution — every remaining call bucketed into a mutually-exclusive outcome taxonomy (e.g. not-answered / vetted / non-vetted caller-side / non-vetted agent-issue), with per-bucket percentages, so the flagged failures are framed against the whole population.
It is the triage front-end: hand the flagged set to cekura-generate-scenarios to build evaluators, or give the user the distribution for a customer-facing quality report.
This skill is strictly read-only — it never creates, updates, or deletes anything.
The single most important job is attribution: a call is an agent failure only when the agent under test caused it. Caller-side endings, simulated-caller disconnects, and recovered calls must NOT be counted as agent failures — they belong in their own buckets.
Step 0 — Prerequisites
Reads through the Cekura MCP. Confirm these are present:
mcp__cekura__aiagents_retrieve— agent description + intended behavior (the yardstick for "failure")mcp__cekura__call_logs_list— paginated production call list (lightweight: usually hasid,duration,call_ended_reason,success, rolled-up metric scores — but often no transcript)mcp__cekura__call_logs_retrieve— full transcript + metric evaluations for a single callmcp__cekura__metrics_list— to find metrics that already grade the KPIs/issues (reuse these as the classification basis when they exist)
If the mcp__cekura__* tools aren't connected, stop and tell the user to connect the Cekura MCP (see /setup-mcp or https://docs.cekura.ai/mcp/overview).
Step 1 — Inputs
Use AskUserQuestion for anything not supplied:
- Agent ID (numeric). If unknown,
mcp__cekura__aiagents_listhelps find it. - (Optional) Project ID.
- Window — how many recent calls (default 100) or a date range. Process in batches (see Step 2).
- KPIs / issues / goals to measure — the heart of the request:
- Explicit issues — e.g. "calls that ended before all vetting questions", "agent looped on an unclear answer", "background noise stalled the agent". Each becomes a flag bucket + a failure-rate number.
- A KPI / goal — e.g. "every call should fully vet the candidate", "what % of answered calls can we improve" — which you invert into the failure(s) that break it.
- Nothing specific → "any genuine agent failure," grounded in
agent_description, classified against the failure-mode taxonomy in Step 3.
- Outcome taxonomy — the mutually-exclusive buckets to distribute ALL calls into. Derive these from the agent's job. For a candidate-vetting agent the natural set is:
not answered·vetted·non-vetted — caller-side·non-vetted — agent/system issue
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 227 lines · 229 tokens per session scan A d482b2806d1b
cekura-flag-call-log-failures is a skill published in the GitHub repository cekura-ai/cekura-skills (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 229 tokens to every session and 3,608 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…