Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cekura-ai/cekura-skills --skill cekura-self-improving-agentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cekura-ai/cekura-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cekura-ai/cekura-skills/cekura-self-improving-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cekura-ai/cekura-skills/cekura-self-improving-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cekura-ai/cekura-skills/cekura-self-improving-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cekura-ai/cekura-skills/cekura-self-improving-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cekura-ai/cekura-skills/cekura-self-improving-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00189 | $0.03502 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00095 | $0.01751 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00700 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00350 |
Grade A, and why
cekura-self-improving-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 232 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Cekura skill verification tag:
ack:cekura-self-improving-agent:6w3k4pWhen you call a Cekura scenario or test-profile write tool from this skill (scenarios_*/test_profiles_*create and update calls), pass this exact string as theskill_ackargument. Metric writes use the metric-family tag — loadcekura-metric-designfirst and pass its tag there.
Before taking any action, call mcp__cekura__cekura_skill_started with
skill_name="cekura-self-improving-agent", verification_tag="ack:cekura-self-improving-agent:6w3k4p",
and plugin_version="0.16".
Cekura Self-Improving Agent (capability-manifest framework)
Turn a failure signal into a verified fix on any agent stack. Rather than modeling "which provider", this skill models "where does the agent's config actually live, and how do I read, render, apply, deploy, and verify it". Many teams keep their agent's config in their own stack — a repo, a database, a prompt registry (e.g. Langfuse) — and materialize the runtime provider agent at deploy time; editing the provider object there fixes a build artifact that the next deploy overwrites. This skill edits the declared source of truth instead, whatever it is.
Performing Platform Actions
When this skill suggests creating, listing, updating, or evaluating something on Cekura, prefer using available platform tools over describing API calls or dashboard steps. In Claude Code with the Cekura plugin installed, these tools are auto-configured and handle authentication, parameter validation, and error handling for you. Fall back to direct API endpoints or dashboard guidance only when no tools are available in the current session.
Core model: fixed invariants, declared mechanics
Layer 1 — invariants. Owned by this skill, never negotiable, identical for every project:
- Must-fail-first, proven by artifact, at minimum cost — before any edit
is proposed, the failure must reproduce in Cekura simulation, recorded as
repro.jsonin the audit dir:{session_id, signal, mode, scenario_ids, result_id, n_runs, fails, injections, config_hash, timestamp}—session_idmust match the active lock; artifacts from other sessions never satisfy the gate. Classify the reproduction mode first and run the minimum the mode allows: deterministic (the trigger can be forced every run — by scenario construction or temporary fault injection in the local bot, markedCEKURA-REPRO-INJECT) → exactly 1 run, must fail 1/1; stochastic (LLM prompt/workflow behavior that can't be forced) → smallest batch expected to fail twice,N = clamp(⌈2/p̂⌉, 4, 10)from the observed failure rate, gate = ≥ 2 fails (all numbers are defaults, overridable via the manifest'spolicy.reproduction). Theresult_idmust be a real Cekura result retrievable viaresults_retrieve. A failing unit/code test never satisfies or substitutes for this gate — code tests may accompany a fix, but the gate artifact is always a Cekura simulation result. Signals from insights/call logs get no exemption: production evidence proves the bug happened, not that you can reproduce it. On Claude Code plugin installs this gate is also mechanically backstopped (best-effort — a fabricated artifact defeats it; LOOP.0's retrieval check is the authoritative gate): a PreToolUse hook (hooks/repro-gate.sh) denies file edits and provider-mutating requests while.cekura/selfimprove.lockis present andrepro.jsonis missing or below its mode's threshold (fault-injection edits markedCEKURA-REPRO-INJECTand.cekura//.claude/writes stay allowed). If a tool call is denied with the gate message, do not work around it — complete Reproduce. Blocked reproduction: when reproducing requires an action only a human may take (the sandbox/deploy path is a maintainer-applied CI label, prod credentials, a gated environment), Reproduce parks: write the full repro plan to the audit dir (scenario spec, mode, N, what human action is needed), ask for that action, and stop. "Please just fix it" does not silently waive the gate — an explicit user override is honored only when recorded inrepro.jsonas{"gate_override": {"by": "user", "reason": ..., "session_id": <active session>}}(all three fields required), every subsequent output (diff header, PR title and body) is marked UNVERIFIED HYPOTHESIS — reproduction gate overridden, and the PR must state that no Cekura reproduction or verification ran. Never record an override the user did not explicitly give in this session. - Verify by re-running Cekura scenarios — a fix counts only when the failure set passes ≥ M of N (default ⌈0.8·N⌉), then the full set passes a sweep, then a regression check shows no collateral damage (revert on any).
- Runtime readback attestation — after every deploy, read what is actually live and compare it to what the source says should exist. Never verify against a runtime you have not attested. Three-way check: source render ↔ live readback ↔ the agent the Cekura traces actually hit.
- No production mutation inside the loop — all iteration happens against a non-production environment/sandbox; production changes only via the explicit Promote phase, with confirmation, a rendered diff, and a rollback path.
- Overfitting gate on edit content (verbatim transcript quotes, hardcoded test data, scenario-specific identifiers, hyper-narrow clauses).
- Budgets and stops —
max_iterations(default 10), oscillation, no-change signature, same failure shape 3×, all-upstream, zero kept failures. - Audit trail — every session leaves a replayable record: manifest version,
baseline config hash, failure set, root cause, edit proposal + diff, eval
results, final diff. Every simulation batch is labeled: pass
nameon eachscenarios_run_*call —[selfimprove:<session_id>] <phase> — <detail>(e.g.[selfimprove:s-0818] repro attempt 2 (must-fail),verify iter3 — failure set,regression — happy path) — so dashboard results map back to the session and phase without opening transcripts.
What ships with it
33 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/fetch_failures.py 12 KB runs code
- agents/openai.yaml 336 B
- phases/clone.md 8.9 KB
- phases/collect.md 19 KB
- phases/debug.md 2.1 KB
- phases/eval.md 9.9 KB
- phases/loop.md 5.9 KB
- phases/optimization/apply.md 4.8 KB
- phases/optimization/fix.md 20 KB
- phases/optimization/sync.md 6.0 KB
- phases/overfitting-gate.md 15 KB
- phases/promote.md 3.4 KB
- phases/regression.md 4.3 KB
- phases/reproduce.md 17 KB
- phases/setup.md 4.5 KB
- providers/bland/overview.md 604 B
- providers/elevenlabs/overview.md 5.1 KB
- providers/elevenlabs/phase-1-fetch.md 3.8 KB
- providers/elevenlabs/phase-4-apply.md 7.5 KB
- providers/elevenlabs/workflow-internals.md 8.1 KB
- providers/retell/overview.md 1.1 KB
- providers/self-hosted/overview.md 18 KB
- providers/vapi/overview.md 3.0 KB
- providers/vapi/phase-1-fetch.md 4.4 KB
- providers/vapi/phase-4-apply.md 8.3 KB
- recipes/custom-mocks.md 1.6 KB
- recipes/provider-managed.md 2.0 KB
- recipes/runtime-created.md 2.9 KB
- references/dynamic-variables-debugging.md 6.8 KB
- references/manifest-guide.md 7.2 KB
- references/manifest.schema.json 12 KB
- references/phase-2-failure-collection.md 4.1 KB
- references/phase-3-diagnosis.md 18 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed 76e71c7be140
- 3d ago Changed 4481fbc117c4
- 8d ago Changed 3ee85394e383
- 12d ago First seen · 232 lines · 189 tokens per session scan A 22cfda8a4c09
cekura-self-improving-agent is a skill published in the GitHub repository cekura-ai/cekura-skills (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 189 tokens to every session and 3,502 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…