Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/cembasaranoglu/crafting-system-claude/code-authoringnpx skills add cembasaranoglu/crafting-system-claude --skill code-authoringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cembasaranoglu/crafting-system-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cembasaranoglu/crafting-system-claude/code-authoring)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cembasaranoglu/crafting-system-claude/code-authoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cembasaranoglu/crafting-system-claude/code-authoring.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00403 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00201 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
code-authoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
code-authoring
Apply this skill for any explicit code-writing or code-editing request.
Required gate sequence before any file mutation:
- Risk classification.
- Intent and stage routing.
- No-assumption contract.
- Execution control.
- Tool permission policy.
- Human approval when the change is destructive.
- Secret-aware behavior when credentials may be touched.
Authoring contract:
- Inspect the actual repository, language, framework, conventions, and existing tests before writing.
- Stay inside the requested scope. Do not silently refactor unrelated code, change deps, or touch generated files.
- Prefer minimal diffs unless a refactor is explicitly authorized.
- Write or update tests when behavior changes.
- Cite the source paths you read and the diffs you produced.
- Run validators that exist in the repo (lint, test, build, type-check); report each command and pass or fail.
- Never claim validation that did not actually run.
Diff-mode and patch-mode:
- Surgical edits → minimal-patch mode.
- Large changes → reduce diff first, classify risk, then proceed in slices.
Refactor flows:
- Pair with refactor-strict for planning. Execute only the bounded slice that was approved.
Hard stops:
- Destructive Git or release operation requested → escalate for human approval.
- Apparent secret value in code or input → switch to secret-aware credential handling.
- Implementation cannot be done without source the user did not provide → return a minimum-input request instead of guessing.
Output:
- Exact file paths changed.
- Behavior changed.
- Tests added or updated.
- Validation run (exact commands and exit status).
- Validation not run (with reason).
- Assumptions, blockers, and rollback notes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 53 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 14d0c119e3ab
code-authoring is a skill published in the GitHub repository cembasaranoglu/crafting-system-claude (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 403 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…