Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cembasaranoglu/crafting-system-claude --skill risk-gategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cembasaranoglu/crafting-system-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cembasaranoglu/crafting-system-claude/risk-gate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cembasaranoglu/crafting-system-claude/risk-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cembasaranoglu/crafting-system-claude/risk-gate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cembasaranoglu/crafting-system-claude/risk-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cembasaranoglu/crafting-system-claude/risk-gate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00245 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00122 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00049 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
risk-gate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Risk Gate
Assess this task: $ARGUMENTS
Instructions
Score each dimension 0 to 3:
- reversibility
- external impact
- uncertainty
- validation availability
- permission sensitivity
Then choose one decision:
- proceed
- inspect_sources
- ask_minimum_input
- plan_only
- stop
- refuse
Ask only for missing input that is blocking. Do not ask for information already available in source material.
Output
risk_gate_result:
overall_risk: "low | medium | high | critical"
score: 0
decision: "proceed | inspect_sources | ask_minimum_input | plan_only | stop | refuse"
dimension_scores:
reversibility: 0
external_impact: 0
uncertainty: 0
validation_availability: 0
permission_sensitivity: 0
blockers: []
non_blocking_assumptions: []
allowed_actions: []
forbidden_actions: []
minimum_user_input_if_blocked: []
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 49 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A fef4aca1b311
risk-gate is a skill published in the GitHub repository cembasaranoglu/crafting-system-claude (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 245 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…