Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio --skill design-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/design-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/design-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/design-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.01923 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00962 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00385 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00192 |
Grade A, and why
design-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 254 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Design Review (Generic)
The general-purpose design-document validator. Use this when the artefact
is not a PRD — concept docs, design bibles, flow specs, journey maps,
narrative briefs, etc. For PRDs, route to /prd-review (this skill will
detect that case and tell you).
Read-only on the source doc. Outputs a verdict + blockers list.
Boundary vs /prd-review
| Doc type | Use |
|---|---|
design/prd/*.md |
/prd-review (specialised PRD validator) |
design/concept.md |
/design-review (concept-doc rules) |
design/design-bible.md |
/design-review (visual-system rules) |
design/flows/*.md |
/design-review (flow-spec rules) |
design/ux/*.md |
/ux-review (defer there) |
Anything else under design/ |
/design-review |
If the user invokes this skill on a design/prd/*.md path, Phase 1 detects
that and recommends /prd-review instead — does not duplicate the PRD
validator's work.
Purpose / When to Run
Run when:
- A non-PRD design doc has been authored or revised and needs a sanity pass before downstream work depends on it.
- A concept doc was just produced by
/brainstorm. - A design bible was just produced by
/design-bible. - A flow spec was extracted via
/reverse-document.
Always run in a fresh session — independent of authoring context.
Inputs
- Path to the design doc.
design/concept.mdfor cross-reference.design/registry/entities.yamlfor entity consistency..claude/docs/technical-preferences.md(constraints).- For UI-related docs:
design/design-bible.md.
Outputs
- A printed verdict: APPROVED / APPROVED WITH NOTES / NEEDS REVISION / MAJOR REVISION.
- A blockers + warnings list with section references.
- Optional
<path>.review.mdsnapshot.
Phase 1: Detect Doc Type and Dispatch
Inspect the path and the file's first 30 lines:
- If path matches
design/prd/*.mdOR file contains a## Detailed Requirementssection withTR-IDs → this is a PRD. Stop and recommend/prd-review <path>. Do not duplicate that skill's checks. - If path matches
design/ux/*.mdOR file is a UX spec → recommend/ux-review <path>. Stop. - If path is
design/concept.md→ use concept-doc rules (Phase 3a). - If path is
design/design-bible.md→ use design-bible rules (Phase 3b). - If path matches
design/flows/*.md→ use flow-spec rules (Phase 3c). - Otherwise → use generic design-doc rules (Phase 3d) and warn the user that the rule set is not specialised.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 254 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 4eff9ad1420d
design-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio (40 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 1,923 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
webgl-holographic-foil
A self-contained WebGL2 hero: thin-film interference over a crushed-foil surface whose palette shifts with the viewing angle; move the cursor to tilt the film.
html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminal
OpenDesign + BYOK: choosing and wiring your own model, hands-on — cost, quality, and the routing decision. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for engineers, IT, applied-AI teams.
html-ppt-taste-brutalist
16:9 HTML deck in tactical-telemetry / CRT-terminal taste. Deactivated-CRT charcoal slides, white-phosphor monospace, hazard-red accent, scanline overlay, ASCII syntax, density over decoration. Distilled from Leonxlnx/taste-skill brutalist-skill (Tactical Telemetry mode).
visual-ralph
Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ralph with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.
accessibility
Consolidated accessibility skill entrypoint for WCAG 2.2, ARIA Authoring Practices, cognitive accessibility, Section 508, EN 301 549, design intent verification, and the Accessibility Planner workflow.
make-resume
A Chinese-language tool for creating editable HTML resumes that can be changed in a browser and printed to PDF. It uses available resume templates when they are installed and otherwise provides a simpler fallback.