A review tool for a user-experience (UX) specification, the document describing how a screen or flow should work and look. It checks the document for accessibility, platform conventions, completeness, and readiness for implementation.

Use it to review a UX specification and produce an approved, needs-revision, or major-revision verdict with specific blockers.

It catches missing states, accessibility problems, overly long text, and platform-specific design issues before engineers build the feature.

ux-review — Skill for Claude Code by cenconq25

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent

npx skills add cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio --skill ux-review

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/ux-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/ux-review)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/ux-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/ux-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/ux-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/ux-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 71 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.

When invoked 1,753 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00071	$0.01753
Opus 5	$0.00036	$0.00877
Sonnet 5	$0.00014	$0.00351
Haiku 4.5	$0.00007	$0.00175

Measured 6d ago against content hash 1f881a45c599, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ux-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/ux-review/SKILL.md · 242 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 242 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

UX Review

A fresh-eyes audit of a single UX spec. Catches the gaps the author cannot see — missing offline state, accessibility holes, copy that goes too long, layout that fights iOS HIG.

Read-only on the spec. Optionally writes a <path>.review.md snapshot.

Purpose / When to Run

Run when:

A UX spec has been authored by /ux-design
The team wants a sanity-check before handing the spec to engineers
A spec was edited significantly and needs re-validation

Run in a fresh session — the reviewer must not inherit the authoring context.

Inputs

Path to the UX spec
Parent PRD
design/design-bible.md
.claude/docs/technical-preferences.md

Outputs

A printed verdict + blockers list
Optional: <path>.review.md

Phase 1: Resolve Path

If a name (not path) was passed, glob design/ux/*.md and find the match. If no argument, ask via AskUserQuestion.

Phase 2: Read

The UX spec
The parent PRD (linked in the spec's header)
The design bible (to verify token references are real)
.claude/docs/technical-preferences.md for platform target and min OS

Phase 3: Run Checks

Each check yields PASS / WARN / FAIL.

3a: Section presence

Required sections grep:

Screen Goal
User Flow Context
Layout & Composition
States
Empty / Loading / Error / Offline
Transitions & Motion
Copy & Tone
Accessibility
Platform Notes
Implementation Hooks

Any missing or [To be designed] → FAIL for that section.

3b: State coverage

Section 4 must enumerate states. Mobile minimum:

Default
Loading
Empty (if the screen displays user data)
Error
Offline
Stale (if cached data is shown anywhere)

Missing required state → FAIL.

Section 5 must give copy + behavior for at least: empty, loading, error, offline. Missing → FAIL.

3c: Token compliance

Every reference in Sections 3, 6 must point to a real token in the design bible:

Color tokens by name (no inline hex)
Type tokens by name (no inline pt sizes)
Space tokens by name (no inline px values)
Radius / elevation / motion tokens

Read the full file on GitHub · 242 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

6d ago First seen · 242 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 1f881a45c599

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ux-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio (40 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 1,753 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Design and UX

webgl-holographic-foil

A self-contained WebGL2 hero: thin-film interference over a crushed-foil surface whose palette shifts with the viewing angle; move the cursor to tilt the film.

nexu-io/open-design · 41 tokens

html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminal

OpenDesign + BYOK: choosing and wiring your own model, hands-on — cost, quality, and the routing decision. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for engineers, IT, applied-AI teams.

nexu-io/open-design · 53 tokens

html-ppt-taste-brutalist

16:9 HTML deck in tactical-telemetry / CRT-terminal taste. Deactivated-CRT charcoal slides, white-phosphor monospace, hazard-red accent, scanline overlay, ASCII syntax, density over decoration. Distilled from Leonxlnx/taste-skill brutalist-skill (Tactical Telemetry mode).

nexu-io/open-design · 78 tokens

ux-review