Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/cfircoo/claude-code-toolkit/generate-prdnpx skills add cfircoo/claude-code-toolkit --skill generate-prdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cfircoo/claude-code-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cfircoo/claude-code-toolkit/generate-prd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cfircoo/claude-code-toolkit/generate-prd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cfircoo/claude-code-toolkit/generate-prd.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00038 | $0.01221 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00611 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00244 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00122 |
Grade A, and why
generate-prd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 169 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Important: This skill creates PRDs only—it does NOT begin implementation.
<quick_start>
- Ask 3-5 clarifying questions with lettered options (A, B, C, D)
- Generate structured PRD based on answers
- Save to
tasks/prd-[feature-name].md</quick_start>
- Problem/Goal: What problem does this solve? Who benefits?
- Core Functionality: What are the must-have features?
- Scope/Boundaries: What is explicitly NOT included?
- Success Criteria: How will we know this worked?
Each question should have 3-4 concrete options (A, B, C, D format) plus "Other" for custom input.
- Introduction/Overview – Brief feature description and problem statement
- Goals – Specific, measurable objectives
- User Stories – Each with title, description, and verifiable acceptance criteria
- Functional Requirements – Numbered explicitly (FR-1, FR-2, etc.)
- Non-Goals – Clear scope boundaries
- Design Considerations – UI/UX requirements (if applicable)
- Technical Considerations – Constraints and dependencies (if applicable)
- Success Metrics – Measurable outcomes
- Open Questions – Remaining clarifications needed
Use kebab-case for feature name (e.g., prd-user-authentication.md).
Good: "Login button redirects to /dashboard on success" Bad: "Login works correctly"
<prd_template>
# PRD: {{Feature Name}}
## 1. Introduction
{{Brief description of the feature and the problem it solves}}
## 2. Goals
- {{Goal 1: Specific, measurable objective}}
- {{Goal 2: Specific, measurable objective}}
## 3. User Stories
### US-1: {{Story Title}}
**As a** {{user type}}, **I want** {{feature}} **so that** {{benefit}}.
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- {{Specific, testable criterion}}
- {{Specific, testable criterion}}
- Verify in browser using dev-browser skill (for UI stories)
### US-2: {{Story Title}}
...
## 4. Functional Requirements
- **FR-1**: {{Explicit requirement}}
- **FR-2**: {{Explicit requirement}}
- **FR-3**: {{Explicit requirement}}
## 5. Non-Goals
- {{What this feature explicitly does NOT do}}
- {{Scope boundary}}
## 6. Design Considerations
{{UI/UX requirements, wireframe references, design patterns}}
## 7. Technical Considerations
{{Constraints, dependencies, integration points, performance requirements}}
## 8. Success Metrics
- {{Measurable outcome 1}}
- {{Measurable outcome 2}}
## 9. Open Questions
- [ ] {{Unresolved question needing clarification}}
</prd_template>
Bad:
- "Search is fast"
- "Shows appropriate error messages"
- "Good UX on save"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 169 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 6446451d33ba
generate-prd is a skill published in the GitHub repository cfircoo/claude-code-toolkit (17 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,221 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…