AzureAI-CopilotStudio-PersonalAgent-Instructions: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/new-example/SKILL.md

new-example is a skill for Claude Code from cgfixit/AzureAI-CopilotStudio-PersonalAgent-Instructions. It costs 59 tokens per session (1,625 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A skill for creating a complete, domain-specific agent instruction file from a template. It covers researching the domain, recording dated constraints, checking licenses, updating the README, and validating the result.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when adding a new file under examples/ for a domain that is not already covered, including research and preflight checks.
Why use it?
It provides a repeatable structure for adding a new example and helps prevent incomplete instructions, filename conflicts, unsupported claims, or missing documentation links.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions CLAUDE.md.

This is cgfixit/AzureAI-CopilotStudio-PersonalAgent-Instructions's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on AzureAI-CopilotStudio-PersonalAgent-Instructions itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything AzureAI-CopilotStudio-PersonalAgent-Instructions configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to cgfixit/AzureAI-CopilotStudio-PersonalAgent-Instructions. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cgfixit/AzureAI-CopilotStudio-PersonalAgent-Instructions/main/.claude/skills/new-example/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cgfixit/AzureAI-CopilotStudio-PersonalAgent-Instructions

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for new-example

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cgfixit/azureai-copilotstudio-personalagent-instructions/new-example/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cgfixit/azureai-copilotstudio-personalagent-instructions/new-example)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cgfixit/azureai-copilotstudio-personalagent-instructions/new-example"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cgfixit/azureai-copilotstudio-personalagent-instructions/new-example/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for new-example

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cgfixit/azureai-copilotstudio-personalagent-instructions/new-example"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cgfixit/azureai-copilotstudio-personalagent-instructions/new-example.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 59 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,625 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00059 $0.01625
Opus 5 $0.00030 $0.00813
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.00325
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00162

Measured 8d ago against content hash 9020ee321f13, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

new-example scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/new-example/SKILL.md · 130 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

New Example — full scaffold protocol

Produce a new fully-instantiated agent instruction file for the requested domain. The output must be indistinguishable in quality from examples/incident-response.md (the canonical shape): a standalone system prompt someone can paste into Azure AI Studio / Copilot Studio / OpenAI Assistants / Claude Projects unedited.

Step 0: Name and scope

  • Filename: kebab-case, examples/<domain>.md (e.g. finops-governance.md). Existing filenames are frozen — never rename an existing example to make room.
  • Collision check: confirm the file doesn't exist and the domain doesn't substantially overlap one of the current examples (cloud-infra, incident-response, network/security, PowerShell coding, Python coding, Veeam backup/DR, YARA). If it overlaps, propose extending the existing file instead and stop for user confirmation.

Step 1: Research the domain BEFORE writing

Collect, with dates and real URLs where they exist:

  1. Products & versions — the 3-6 products/tools the agent will cover, each with its current major version. Honesty rule: if the domain uses real products, every version, deprecation, and behavior claim you write must be verifiable against that vendor's official docs. If you cannot verify, use clearly fictional products (like TEMPLATE.md's "Product X") — never plausible-but-invented claims about real ones.
  2. ≥2 critical constraints — hard, dated rules of the form the template's [CRITICAL_CONSTRAINT_*] placeholders expect ("X was deprecated in vN (date) — never state it works in vN+1", "Feature Y requires license Z"). These anchor the file's version-strictness and later feed /red-team test generation.
  3. Tiered sources — Tier 1: the domain's official docs/release notes/API references (real URLs); Tier 2: official blogs/best-practice guides; Tier 3: internal-notes categories.
  4. Escalation contact — fake but plausible (<domain>[email protected], ticket process ID like KB-<DOMAIN>-WORKFLOW). Never a real internal address.
  5. Reasoning dimensions — the 4-8 domain-specific checklist dimensions for the o3 Reasoning Protocol (what must the agent pin down before answering: edition? platform? version? blast radius? licensing?).
  6. Response-mode triggers — the 4-6 phrasings users in this domain actually use, mapped to output modes (Procedure / Quick Fact / Troubleshoot / Design / Clarify).

Read the full file on GitHub · 130 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 130 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 9020ee321f13

Subscribe to this mod's changes

new-example is a skill published in the GitHub repository cgfixit/AzureAI-CopilotStudio-PersonalAgent-Instructions (1 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 1,625 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.