Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Chachamaru127/codex-harness. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Chachamaru127/codex-harness/main/.codex/skills/ci/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Chachamaru127/codex-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chachamaru127/codex-harness/ci)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chachamaru127/codex-harness/ci"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chachamaru127/codex-harness/ci/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chachamaru127/codex-harness/ci"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chachamaru127/codex-harness/ci.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01814 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00726 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00363 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00181 |
Grade A, and why
ci scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to ci — 32 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 197 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CI/CD Skills
CI/CD パイプラインに関する問題を解決するスキル群です。
発動条件
- 「CIが落ちた」「GitHub Actionsが失敗」
- 「ビルドエラー」「テストが通らない」
- 「パイプラインを直して」
機能詳細
| 機能 | 詳細 | トリガー |
|---|---|---|
| 失敗分析 | See references/analyzing-failures.md | 「ログを見て」「原因を調べて」 |
| テスト修正 | See references/fixing-tests.md | 「テストを直して」「修正案を出して」 |
実行手順
- テスト vs 実装判定（Step 0）
- ユーザーの意図を分類（分析 or 修正）
- 複雑度を判定（下記参照）
- 上記の「機能詳細」から適切な参照ファイルを読む、または ci-cd-fixer サブエージェント起動
- 結果を確認し、必要に応じて再実行
Step 0: テスト vs 実装判定（品質判定ゲート）
CI 失敗時、まず原因の切り分けを行う:
CI 失敗報告
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ テスト vs 実装判定 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ エラーの原因を分析: │
│ ├── 実装が間違い → 実装を修正 │
│ ├── テストが古い → ユーザーに確認 │
│ └── 環境問題 → 環境修正 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
禁止事項（改ざん防止）
⚠️ CI 失敗時の禁止事項
以下の「解決策」は禁止です：
| 禁止 | 例 | 正しい対応 |
|------|-----|-----------|
| テスト skip 化 | `it.skip(...)` | 実装を修正 |
| アサーション削除 | `expect()` を消す | 期待値を確認 |
| CI チェック迂回 | `continue-on-error` | 根本原因修正 |
| lint ルール緩和 | `eslint-disable` | コードを修正 |
判断フロー
🔴 CI が失敗しています
**判断が必要です**:
1. **実装が間違い** → 実装を修正 ✅
2. **テストの期待値が古い** → ユーザーに確認を求める
3. **環境の問題** → 環境設定を修正
⚠️ テストの改ざん（skip化、アサーション削除）は禁止です
どれに該当しますか？
承認が必要な場合
テスト/設定の変更がやむを得ない場合:
## 🚨 テスト/設定変更の承認リクエスト
### 理由
[なぜこの変更が必要か]
### 変更内容
[差分]
### 代替案の検討
- [ ] 実装の修正で解決できないか確認した
ユーザーの明示的な承認を待つ
Git log 拡張フラグの活用（CC 2.1.38+）
CI 失敗時の原因コミット特定に構造化ログを活用します。
原因コミットの特定
# 構造化フォーマットでコミット分析
git log --format="%h|%s|%an|%ad" --date=short -10
# トポロジカル順序で時系列分析
git log --topo-order --oneline -20
# 変更ファイルと原因の紐付け
git log --raw --oneline -5
主な活用場面
| 用途 | フラグ | 効果 |
|---|---|---|
| 失敗原因の特定 | `--format="%h | %s"` |
| 時系列での追跡 | --topo-order |
マージ順序を考慮した追跡 |
| 変更影響の把握 | --raw |
ファイル変更の詳細表示 |
| マージ除外分析 | --cherry-pick --no-merges |
実コミットのみを抽出 |
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 197 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 476ef55a8c9f
ci is a skill published in the GitHub repository Chachamaru127/codex-harness (2 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,814 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to ci, differing in 32 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
repair-github-ci
Fix failing GitHub CI / Actions checks via fixgithubprci and push to the existing PR head, or fix a branch's failing CI via a linked repair worktree.
mcore-create-issue
Investigate a failing GitHub Actions run or job and create a GitHub issue for the failure.
debug-task
Diagnose and fix moon tasks that are broken, misconfigured, or behaving unexpectedly. Use this skill when a moon task is failing, not running, skipped, hanging, producing stale or wrong output, cached when it shouldn't be, re-running every time, or missing outputs after a cache hit. Also covers pipeline hangs, tasks…
operating-github-ci-fixer
Use when the user asks OpenSRE to fix failing GitHub CI, GitHub Actions checks, failing pull request checks, a broken PR branch, or CI on a named branch such as main.
meta-long-running-build-watchdog
Watches a long-running command via tmux, lets sub-agent diagnose failures and propose a fix, and records the diagnosis to memory. Designed for overnight model fine-tunes, CI image builds, or repeated regression suites that may fail intermittently.
gh-fix-ci
Use when a user asks to debug or fix failing GitHub PR checks that run in GitHub Actions; use gh to inspect checks and logs, summarize failure context, draft a fix plan, and implement only after explicit approval. Treat external providers (for example Buildkite) as out of scope and report only the details URL.