Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/chachamaru127/codex-harness/cinpx skills add Chachamaru127/codex-harness --skill cigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Chachamaru127/codex-harnessWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00058 | $0.01814 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00907 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00363 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00181 |
Grade A, and why
ci scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to ci — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 197 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CI/CD Skills
CI/CD パイプラインに関する問題を解決するスキル群です。
発動条件
- 「CIが落ちた」「GitHub Actionsが失敗」
- 「ビルドエラー」「テストが通らない」
- 「パイプラインを直して」
機能詳細
| 機能 | 詳細 | トリガー |
|---|---|---|
| 失敗分析 | See references/analyzing-failures.md | 「ログを見て」「原因を調べて」 |
| テスト修正 | See references/fixing-tests.md | 「テストを直して」「修正案を出して」 |
実行手順
- テスト vs 実装判定（Step 0）
- ユーザーの意図を分類（分析 or 修正）
- 複雑度を判定（下記参照）
- 上記の「機能詳細」から適切な参照ファイルを読む、または ci-cd-fixer サブエージェント起動
- 結果を確認し、必要に応じて再実行
Step 0: テスト vs 実装判定（品質判定ゲート）
CI 失敗時、まず原因の切り分けを行う:
CI 失敗報告
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ テスト vs 実装判定 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ エラーの原因を分析: │
│ ├── 実装が間違い → 実装を修正 │
│ ├── テストが古い → ユーザーに確認 │
│ └── 環境問題 → 環境修正 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
禁止事項（改ざん防止）
⚠️ CI 失敗時の禁止事項
以下の「解決策」は禁止です：
| 禁止 | 例 | 正しい対応 |
|------|-----|-----------|
| テスト skip 化 | `it.skip(...)` | 実装を修正 |
| アサーション削除 | `expect()` を消す | 期待値を確認 |
| CI チェック迂回 | `continue-on-error` | 根本原因修正 |
| lint ルール緩和 | `eslint-disable` | コードを修正 |
判断フロー
🔴 CI が失敗しています
**判断が必要です**:
1. **実装が間違い** → 実装を修正 ✅
2. **テストの期待値が古い** → ユーザーに確認を求める
3. **環境の問題** → 環境設定を修正
⚠️ テストの改ざん（skip化、アサーション削除）は禁止です
どれに該当しますか？
承認が必要な場合
テスト/設定の変更がやむを得ない場合:
## 🚨 テスト/設定変更の承認リクエスト
### 理由
[なぜこの変更が必要か]
### 変更内容
[差分]
### 代替案の検討
- [ ] 実装の修正で解決できないか確認した
ユーザーの明示的な承認を待つ
Git log 拡張フラグの活用（CC 2.1.38+）
CI 失敗時の原因コミット特定に構造化ログを活用します。
原因コミットの特定
# 構造化フォーマットでコミット分析
git log --format="%h|%s|%an|%ad" --date=short -10
# トポロジカル順序で時系列分析
git log --topo-order --oneline -20
# 変更ファイルと原因の紐付け
git log --raw --oneline -5
主な活用場面
| 用途 | フラグ | 効果 |
|---|---|---|
| 失敗原因の特定 | `--format="%h | %s"` |
| 時系列での追跡 | --topo-order |
マージ順序を考慮した追跡 |
| 変更影響の把握 | --raw |
ファイル変更の詳細表示 |
| マージ除外分析 | --cherry-pick --no-merges |
実コミットのみを抽出 |
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 197 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 476ef55a8c9f
ci is a skill published in the GitHub repository Chachamaru127/codex-harness (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,814 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to ci, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
multi-agent-release-manager
Cleans up the workspace, formats code, runs presubmit checks, and uploads CLs to Gerrit.
dsh-web-pre-push-checks
Use before pushing, opening or updating a pull request, or claiming dsh-web checks pass. Selects the required repository gates and diff-specific generation, build, and GUI evidence.
babysit
Same-session monitoring loop for PRs, CI runs, tickets, and deployments using the monitorstart / monitorupdate / autonudgestop MCP tools. The loop re-injects your check instructions into THIS session on an idle interval — same context, same tools — and works from dashboard chat, Slack threads, and Discord DMs. Use…
azsdk-common-pipeline-analysis
Analyze Azure SDK CI/CD pipeline failures into a structured diagnosis, and define the required output format. Load this skill before calling azsdkanalyzepipeline, which returns raw failure data that this skill interprets and formats. USE FOR: "pipeline failed", "build failure", "CI check failing", "tests failing in…
harness-setup
HAR: Project init, tool setup, agent config, memory setup, skill mirror sync. Trigger: setup, init, new project, CI/Codex setup, harness-mem, mirror. Do NOT load for: implementation, review, release, planning.
managing-github-actions-secrets
Creates and updates GitHub Actions secrets for PostHog workflows. Use when adding a new CI secret, rotating an existing secret, wiring a workflow to an API token, package registry credential, deploy key, or any value referenced via ${{ secrets. }} in .github/workflows/.