Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Chachamaru127/codex-harness. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Chachamaru127/codex-harness/main/.codex/skills/harness-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Chachamaru127/codex-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chachamaru127/codex-harness/harness-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chachamaru127/codex-harness/harness-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chachamaru127/codex-harness/harness-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chachamaru127/codex-harness/harness-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chachamaru127/codex-harness/harness-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.06424 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.03212 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01285 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00642 |
Grade A, and why
harness-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 615 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Skills
コードレビュー、計画レビュー、スコープ分析を担当するスキル群です。 コンテキストからレビュータイプを自動判定します。
レビュータイプ（Context-Aware）
レビュータイプはコンテキストから自動判定されます：
| Recent Activity | Review Type | 4 Experts |
|---|---|---|
/plan-with-agent 後 |
Plan Review | Clarity, Feasibility, Dependencies, Acceptance |
/work 後 |
Code Review | Security, Performance, Quality, Accessibility |
| タスク追加後 | Scope Review | Scope-creep, Priority, Feasibility, Impact |
手動指定
/harness-review # 自動判定
/harness-review code # コードレビュー強制
/harness-review plan # 計画レビュー強制
/harness-review scope # スコープ分析強制
機能詳細（Code Review）
| 機能 | 詳細 |
|---|---|
| 変更レビュー | See references/changes-review.md |
| 品質チェック | See references/quality-review.md |
| セキュリティ | See references/security-review.md |
| パフォーマンス | See references/performance-review.md |
| アクセシビリティ | See references/accessibility-review.md |
| SEO/OGP | See references/seo-review.md |
| Codex 統合 | See references/codex-integration.md |
| コミット判定 | See references/commit-judgment-logic.md |
機能詳細（Plan/Scope Review）
Plan Review と Scope Review は Codex エキスパートを使用します：
| レビュータイプ | エキスパート | 参照 |
|---|---|---|
| Plan Review | Clarity, Feasibility, Dependencies, Acceptance | ../codex-review/references/experts/clarity-expert.md 等 |
| Scope Review | Scope-creep, Priority, Feasibility, Impact | ../codex-review/references/experts/scope-creep-expert.md 等 |
詳細: ../codex-review/references/codex-parallel-review.md
実行手順
- 品質判定ゲート（Step 0）
- 残コンテキスト確認（Codex モード時）（Step 1）
- ユーザーのリクエストを分類
- （Claude-mem 有効時）過去のレビュー指摘を検索
- 並列実行の判定（下記参照）
- 上記の「機能詳細」から適切な参照ファイルを読む、または並列サブエージェント起動
- 結果を統合してレビュー完了
What ships with it
11 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- CLAUDE.md 637 B
- references/accessibility-review.md 3.8 KB
- references/changes-review.md 4.2 KB
- references/CLAUDE.md 338 B
- references/codex-integration.md 5.1 KB
- references/commit-judgment-logic.md 4.5 KB
- references/determine-review-mode.md 3.2 KB
- references/performance-review.md 3.4 KB
- references/quality-review.md 5.9 KB
- references/security-review.md 8.6 KB
- references/seo-review.md 7.0 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 615 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 93cb9c8d7503
harness-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Chachamaru127/codex-harness (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 6,424 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…