Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add chafoo/anchored --skill setupgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chafoo/anchoredWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chafoo/anchored/setup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chafoo/anchored/setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chafoo/anchored/setup/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chafoo/anchored/setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chafoo/anchored/setup.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00180 | $0.01223 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00072 | $0.00489 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00245 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00122 |
Grade A, and why
setup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/a:setup — author the project's anchored.yml
anchored.yml is deliberately tiny. Everything you may write, exhaustively:
fields: # top-level, for ALL setups — record form name: type
commit: string # string | number | boolean
defaults: # the setup shape, used when a criterion has no setup
validator: { instructions: "…", require: grounded } # `require` optional, see below
before: { instructions: "…" }
after: { instructions: "…" }
setups:
frontend: # user-named; EXACTLY the same three slots as defaults
validator: { instructions: "…" }
before: { instructions: "…" }
after: { instructions: "…" }
Full commented example: references/anchored.example.yml.
The guardrails (you enforce these while authoring)
- A setup is verification know-how for one kind of work — the domain axis. It attaches
per criterion at run time. It is parametrisation of the ONE loop, never a step sequence:
no
steps, noextends, no nesting. The schema rejects them; don't try. - Hooks are instructions the agent executes, not harness-run command lists — that's
what lets them wrap context around a CLI call ("run
bun run typecheck; treat red as a failed gate"). Write them as instruction prose containing the concrete commands.beforeruns ahead of each validator spawn for that setup's gates;afteron a setup fires when one of its gates goes green;afterondefaultsis the close-time hook. validator.require: groundedis the one HARD knob — the only place config stops being advice. It makes a setup refuse a prose verdict: proof must carry the real output of something the validator ran (UngroundedEvidenceotherwise). Offer it where the subject is genuinely executable and the stakes are high (areleasesetup); never make it the default, and never put it on a setup that verifies assets, copy or design — those are proven by inspection, and that is proof too. Criteria markedjudgment: truestay exempt everywhere. It merges DOWN: set ondefaults, a named setup keeps it even when it writes its owninstructions.- NOT config, by design — refuse politely and say where it lives instead:
rigor/ quality bar → per task, in the run file, from the user's words at anchor time- gate layout → the AI slices gates itself, sized to the rigor
- architecture/conventions →
.claude/rules/(every validator reads them anyway) - git/CI built-ins → don't exist; wire them via hook instructions +
fields
- Custom fields are top-level and shared by all setups; a hook fills them via
anchored set <slug> <cN> <field>=<value>.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 85 lines · 180 tokens per session scan A 194a84ea6ef3
setup is a skill published in the GitHub repository chafoo/anchored (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 180 tokens to every session and 1,223 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
qa
Browser-based QA verification. Launches a real browser, navigates the app, clicks buttons, fills forms, and tests user flows. Works as a standalone skill or as a phase end condition in campaigns. Requires Playwright (optional dependency, graceful skip if not installed).
live-preview
Mid-build visual verification loop. Takes screenshots of components during construction, not just after. Catches visual regressions and invisible features before they compound. Requires Playwright or similar screenshot tool.
test-gen
Generate and verify tests — happy path, edge cases, error paths — using the project's own framework and patterns.
scenario-design
Draft real-life test SCENARIOS (not smoke tests) from a change/feature spec. Derives edge-case, performance, frontend-quirk and error-handling scenarios with ISTQB techniques, routes each to a test level, and writes test-plan.md, emitting clarification questions on a spec gap. Use on "design test scenarios", "what…
accessibility-testing
WCAG compliance testing and accessibility quality assurance workflows for iOS apps. Use when validating accessibility labels, testing VoiceOver compatibility, checking contrast ratios, or ensuring WCAG 2.1 compliance. Covers accessibility tree analysis, semantic validation, and automated accessibility testing patterns.
ios-testing-patterns
XCTest and XCUITest execution workflows and flaky test detection patterns.