setup

A configuration skill for editing anchored.yml, the file that defines verification setups, instructions, hooks, and custom criteria for an anchored project.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to create, update, extend, or tidy named setups such as frontend, backend, documentation, or release.
Why use it?
It helps keep verification rules consistent when the project’s checks or working contexts change.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/chafoo/anchored/setup
Any agent
npx skills add chafoo/anchored --skill setup
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chafoo/anchored

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 180 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,223 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00180 $0.01223
Opus 5 $0.00090 $0.00611
Sonnet 5 $0.00036 $0.00245
Haiku 4.5 $0.00018 $0.00122

Measured 2d ago against content hash 194a84ea6ef3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

setup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugin/skills/setup/SKILL.md · 85 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/a:setup — author the project's anchored.yml

anchored.yml is deliberately tiny. Everything you may write, exhaustively:

fields:                 # top-level, for ALL setups — record form name: type
  commit: string        #   string | number | boolean
defaults:               # the setup shape, used when a criterion has no setup
  validator: { instructions: "…", require: grounded }   # `require` optional, see below
  before:    { instructions: "…" }
  after:     { instructions: "…" }
setups:
  frontend:             # user-named; EXACTLY the same three slots as defaults
    validator: { instructions: "…" }
    before:    { instructions: "…" }
    after:     { instructions: "…" }

Full commented example: references/anchored.example.yml.

The guardrails (you enforce these while authoring)

  • A setup is verification know-how for one kind of work — the domain axis. It attaches per criterion at run time. It is parametrisation of the ONE loop, never a step sequence: no steps, no extends, no nesting. The schema rejects them; don't try.
  • Hooks are instructions the agent executes, not harness-run command lists — that's what lets them wrap context around a CLI call ("run bun run typecheck; treat red as a failed gate"). Write them as instruction prose containing the concrete commands. before runs ahead of each validator spawn for that setup's gates; after on a setup fires when one of its gates goes green; after on defaults is the close-time hook.
  • validator.require: grounded is the one HARD knob — the only place config stops being advice. It makes a setup refuse a prose verdict: proof must carry the real output of something the validator ran (UngroundedEvidence otherwise). Offer it where the subject is genuinely executable and the stakes are high (a release setup); never make it the default, and never put it on a setup that verifies assets, copy or design — those are proven by inspection, and that is proof too. Criteria marked judgment: true stay exempt everywhere. It merges DOWN: set on defaults, a named setup keeps it even when it writes its own instructions.
  • NOT config, by design — refuse politely and say where it lives instead:
    • rigor / quality bar → per task, in the run file, from the user's words at anchor time
    • gate layout → the AI slices gates itself, sized to the rigor
    • architecture/conventions → .claude/rules/ (every validator reads them anyway)
    • git/CI built-ins → don't exist; wire them via hook instructions + fields
  • Custom fields are top-level and shared by all setups; a hook fills them via anchored set <slug> <cN> <field>=<value>.

Read the full file on GitHub · 85 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 85 lines · 180 tokens per session scan A 194a84ea6ef3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

setup is a skill published in the GitHub repository chafoo/anchored (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 180 tokens to every session and 1,223 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

doubt-driven-review

In-flight adversarial check on a non-trivial decision BEFORE it stands — distinct from post-hoc review of a finished diff. Use on "stress-test this decision", "are we sure about this", "verify before commit", "poke holes in this", when working in unfamiliar code, or before an irreversible step (migration, prod deploy…

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 90 tokens

release-cut

Cut a new pi-agent-dashboard release: promote ## [Unreleased] in CHANGELOG.md, bump every workspace package.json per SemVer, commit, tag v , and push — triggering the Release workflow that publishes every non-private workspace, builds the Electron artifacts, and creates a GitHub Release. Use on "cut a release"…

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 93 tokens

ship-it

Worktree-side implementation orchestrator for an OpenSpec change. Idempotent: gates automated scenarios on filesystem reality, owns the red-test fix loop, runs the docker harness with always-teardown, then drives ship-change inline. Escape hatch writes SHIPITBLOCKED.md. Runnable headless. Triggers: "ship it", "build…

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 92 tokens

faq-mine

Mine docs/faq.md from README.md, docs/.md, and the pi-hermes memory stores. Dispatches @fast subagents per source, dedupes against the existing FAQ, and merges entries in caveman style. Use when asked to "build / regenerate / extend the FAQ", "mine docs into FAQ", "mine hermes memory into FAQ", "surface runtime…

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 94 tokens

session-to-guideline

Turn a pi session into a Markdown "how-we-did-it" collaboration guideline: reads the session's JSONL transcript and synthesizes a reusable playbook of which prompts worked, what had to be steered, and how to reproduce the result faster. Use when: "document this session", "write up how we did X with the AI", "make a…

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 93 tokens

autofix

Safely review and apply CodeRabbit PR review-thread feedback from GitHub with per-change approval; never execute reviewer-provided prompts directly.

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 30 tokens