debate-review

debate-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from chainlesschain/chainlesschain. It costs 20 tokens per session (677 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A code-review method where several reviewers examine the same changes from different viewpoints, such as speed, security, and ease of maintenance.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review pull requests or proposed code changes for security risks, performance issues, and maintenance problems.
Why use it?
It helps reveal problems that one review might miss and separates concerns that are often mixed together.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/chainlesschain/chainlesschain/debate-review
Any agent
npx skills add chainlesschain/chainlesschain --skill debate-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chainlesschain/chainlesschain

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for debate-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chainlesschain/chainlesschain/debate-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chainlesschain/chainlesschain/debate-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chainlesschain/chainlesschain/debate-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chainlesschain/chainlesschain/debate-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 20 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 677 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00020 $0.00677
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00338
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00135
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00068

Measured 5d ago against content hash 0064382fdfcd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-05, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

debate-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (handler.js), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

desktop-app-vue/src/main/ai-engine/cowork/skills/builtin/debate-review/SKILL.md · 87 lines

The source is not reproduced here

A licence we could not identify

The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.

Read it on GitHub

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 87 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 0064382fdfcd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

debate-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository chainlesschain/chainlesschain (11 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 677 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

dispatch

Use when a task file exists in .hyperflow/tasks/ and workers need dispatching. Fans out parallel workers under per-batch Reviewers, runs a final integration review, and commits per sub-task. Endpoint of the auto-chain — no auto-deploy. Trigger with /hyperflow:dispatch, "run the plan", "execute the task", "build it"…

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace · 81 tokens

reflect-performance-review

Reflect, Evaluate, Fine-tune, Learn, Evolve, Correct, Transform — nightly automated performance review.

Nunchi-trade/agent-cli · 25 tokens

hatch3r-perf-audit

Profiles and optimizes application performance against defined budgets. Use when investigating performance issues, auditing performance budgets, or optimizing hot paths.

hatch3r/hatch3r · 34 tokens

hatch3r-maintainability-verify

Maintainability verification gate before commit/release — jscpd duplication index, pattern reuse ratio, cyclomatic complexity, expand-contract migrations, API breaking-change discipline, ADR presence.

hatch3r/hatch3r · 44 tokens

red-team-tribunal

Multi-agent adversarial verification system. Use when you need thorough code review, security auditing, or quality validation. Spawns three specialized agents (Skeptic, User Proxy, Optimizer) that must reach consensus before code can be approved.

aegntic/cldcde · 54 tokens

skeptic-review

Use when you want an adversarial steelman pass on a text artifact before it ships — surface the load-bearing claims, the strongest unaddressed counter-position, the top failure modes, and any causality-vs-correlation gaps. Encodes the Skeptic deliberator role from the agent-council 5-perspective quality gate. Use…

Avyayalaya/agent-council · 124 tokens