Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add chancegraff/rules-for-claude --skill computer-usegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chancegraff/rules-for-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chancegraff/rules-for-claude/computer-use)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chancegraff/rules-for-claude/computer-use"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chancegraff/rules-for-claude/computer-use/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chancegraff/rules-for-claude/computer-use"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chancegraff/rules-for-claude/computer-use.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00203 | $0.02047 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00081 | $0.00819 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00041 | $0.00409 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00205 |
Grade A, and why
computer-use scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 68 lines · 203 tokens per session scan A bc4b958fd640
computer-use is a skill published in the GitHub repository chancegraff/rules-for-claude (4 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 203 tokens to every session and 2,047 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-13.
Other skills, from other repositories
ask-agents
Send a task or question to Claude Code and/or Gemini as external subagents and report back what they said. Use when the user asks to ask Claude, ask Gemini, ask both, get a second opinion, split reviewer roles, or compare external agents.
prompt
Turn a rough, dictated, or ambiguous request into a clear, structured task, then carry it out. Use when a request is conversational, messy, underspecified, or high-stakes enough to deserve careful framing before work begins.
review-plan
Review a proposed plan with a single-pass structured critique and a clear verdict. Use when the user asks to review a plan, stress-test a plan, critique a workflow, identify risks, or improve an execution sequence.
token-conservation
Enforces token quota management at session start with conservation and compression checks. Use at the start of every session or before large context loads.
low-code-platforms
Low-code and internal tool platforms including Retool, Supabase, Appsmith, Tooljet, n8n, and Zapier. Use when building admin panels, internal tools, workflow automations, or integrating low-code platforms with custom code.
done
Wrap up the current session by writing a short HANDOFF.md in the project folder, so the next session can resume quickly. Use when the user says done, wrap up, close this out, or capture the session.