Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill --skill algo-rec-cfgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/algo-rec-cf)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/algo-rec-cf"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/algo-rec-cf/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/algo-rec-cf"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/algo-rec-cf.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.00884 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00442 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00177 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
"algo-rec-cf" scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to algo-rec-cf — 8 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Collaborative Filtering
Overview
Collaborative filtering recommends items based on collective user behavior patterns. User-based CF finds similar users; item-based CF finds similar items. Computes in O(U² × I) for user-based or O(I² × U) for item-based where U=users, I=items.
When to Use
Trigger conditions:
- Building recommendations from user-item interaction data (ratings, clicks, purchases)
- Finding "users like you also liked" or "frequently bought together" patterns
When NOT to use:
- When you have no interaction data (cold start — use content-based filtering)
- When item features matter more than behavior patterns (use content-based)
Algorithm
IRON LAW: CF Requires SUFFICIENT Interaction Data
With sparse matrices (< 1% fill rate), similarity computation is
unreliable. Minimum viable: each user has rated 5+ items, each item
has 5+ ratings. Below this, fallback to content-based or popularity.
Phase 1: Input Validation
Load user-item interaction matrix. Check sparsity level and filter users/items below minimum interaction threshold. Gate: Matrix sparsity < 99%, minimum interaction thresholds met.
Phase 2: Core Algorithm
User-based CF:
- Compute pairwise user similarity (cosine or Pearson correlation)
- For target user, find top-K most similar users
- Predict rating: weighted average of similar users' ratings
Item-based CF:
- Compute pairwise item similarity from co-rating patterns
- For target item, find top-K most similar items
- Predict: weighted average of user's ratings on similar items
Phase 3: Verification
Hold out 20% of interactions for testing. Compute RMSE, MAE, or precision@K / recall@K. Gate: RMSE below baseline (global mean predictor).
Phase 4: Output
Return top-N recommendations with predicted scores.
Output Format
{
"recommendations": [{"item_id": "123", "predicted_score": 4.2, "similar_items_used": 5}],
"metadata": {"method": "item-based", "similarity": "cosine", "k_neighbors": 20, "sparsity": 0.97}
}
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 88 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A 058a8c72dd87
"algo-rec-cf" is a skill published in the GitHub repository charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill (25 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 884 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to algo-rec-cf, differing in 8 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
data-type-classifier
Classify construction data by type (structured, unstructured, semi-structured). Analyze data sources and recommend appropriate storage/processing methods.
ontology-mapper
Map construction data to standard ontologies. Create semantic mappings between different data schemas.
rag-construction
Build RAG systems for construction knowledge bases. Create searchable AI-powered construction document systems.
few-shot-examples
Curated few-shot examples for construction AI tasks: classification, extraction, analysis. Domain-specific examples for improved LLM performance.
bim-cost-estimation-cwicr
Automated cost estimation from BIM models using DDC CWICR database (8 national bases, 78,228 positions). AI classification + vector search for accurate pricing.
cad-to-data
Convert CAD/BIM files to structured data. Extract element data from Revit, IFC, DWG, DGN files.