Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill --skill algo-seo-tfidfgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/algo-seo-tfidf)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/algo-seo-tfidf"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/algo-seo-tfidf/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/algo-seo-tfidf"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/algo-seo-tfidf.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.00992 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00496 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00198 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
"algo-seo-tfidf" scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to algo-seo-tfidf — 8 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TF-IDF
Overview
TF-IDF (Term Frequency–Inverse Document Frequency) scores term importance as TF(t,d) × IDF(t). High scores mean a term is frequent in a document but rare across the corpus. Computes in O(N × V) where N is documents and V is vocabulary size.
When to Use
Trigger conditions:
- Ranking documents by keyword relevance
- Extracting distinguishing terms from documents
- Building lightweight search without ML models
When NOT to use:
- When semantic similarity matters (use embeddings instead)
- When you need ranking with link authority (combine with PageRank)
Algorithm
IRON LAW: TF-IDF Measures RELATIVE Importance
- A term with high TF but low IDF is common, NOT important
- TF-IDF = TF(t,d) × log(N / DF(t))
- A term appearing in ALL documents has IDF = 0 → score = 0
Phase 1: Input Validation
Tokenize documents, apply lowercasing, remove stop words. Build vocabulary. Gate: All documents tokenized, vocabulary size reasonable.
Phase 2: Core Algorithm
- Compute TF(t,d) for each term in each document (raw count, log-normalized, or boolean)
- Compute IDF(t) = log(N / DF(t)) where DF(t) = number of documents containing term t
- Compute TF-IDF(t,d) = TF(t,d) × IDF(t)
- Optionally L2-normalize document vectors for cosine similarity
Phase 3: Verification
Check: terms appearing in all documents have IDF ≈ 0. Rare terms have high IDF. Gate: Score distribution is reasonable; common words score low.
Phase 4: Output
Return scored terms per document or ranked documents per query.
Output Format
{
"query_results": [{"document": "doc_id", "score": 0.73, "matching_terms": ["term1", "term2"]}],
"metadata": {"corpus_size": 1000, "vocabulary_size": 5000, "tf_variant": "log_normalized"}
}
Examples
Sample I/O
Input: Corpus: ["the cat sat", "the dog sat", "the cat played"], Query: "cat" Expected: TF("cat", doc1)=1/3, DF("cat")=2, IDF=log(3/2)=0.405. TF-IDF(doc1)=0.135, TF-IDF(doc3)=0.135, TF-IDF(doc2)=0
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 92 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A db8c35f01dea
"algo-seo-tfidf" is a skill published in the GitHub repository charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill (25 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 992 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to algo-seo-tfidf, differing in 8 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
data-type-classifier
Classify construction data by type (structured, unstructured, semi-structured). Analyze data sources and recommend appropriate storage/processing methods.
ontology-mapper
Map construction data to standard ontologies. Create semantic mappings between different data schemas.
rag-construction
Build RAG systems for construction knowledge bases. Create searchable AI-powered construction document systems.
few-shot-examples
Curated few-shot examples for construction AI tasks: classification, extraction, analysis. Domain-specific examples for improved LLM performance.
bim-cost-estimation-cwicr
Automated cost estimation from BIM models using DDC CWICR database (8 national bases, 78,228 positions). AI classification + vector search for accurate pricing.
cad-to-data
Convert CAD/BIM files to structured data. Extract element data from Revit, IFC, DWG, DGN files.