Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill --skill biz-net-zero-transitiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/biz-net-zero-transition)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/biz-net-zero-transition"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/biz-net-zero-transition/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/biz-net-zero-transition"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/biz-net-zero-transition.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00285 | $0.06875 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00143 | $0.03438 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00057 | $0.01375 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00688 |
Grade A, and why
"biz-net-zero-transition" scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to biz-net-zero-transition — 9 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 452 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
淨零轉型實務工具箱(Net-Zero Transition Playbook)
定位
「淨零(Net-Zero)」是 2050 年前後多數國家的法定或承諾目標。對台灣企業而言,淨零轉型的實務壓力來自:
- 國家政策:《氣候變遷因應法》、碳費、能源轉型
- 國際客戶:Apple、Nike、Walmart 等要求供應鏈減碳
- 資本市場:ISSB 揭露、ESG 投資流向
- 貿易壁壘:歐盟 CBAM、美國清潔競爭法案
- 融資條件:綠色貸款、永續連結貸款
EMBA 學員面對的核心問題通常是:「我該怎麼做?從哪開始?花多少錢?多久見效?」本 skill 提供從「盤查 → 目標 → 路徑 → 揭露 → 執行 → 驗證」的完整流程。
與相近 Asgard skill 的邊界:
grad-sustainability— 永續理論層(TBL、SDG、ESG、循環經濟)- 本 skill — 實務執行(盤查方法、SBTi 申請、TCFD 揭露、供應鏈減碳、台灣碳費)
何時使用
觸發條件
- 首次啟動碳盤查
- 設計 2030 / 2050 減碳目標
- TCFD / ISSB / 永續報告書撰寫
- 回應國際客戶減碳問卷(CDP、EcoVadis)
- 供應鏈碳管理系統建置
- 碳費應對與財務影響分析
- CBAM、清潔競爭法案等貿易壁壘應對
- 綠電採購、再生能源憑證
- EMBA ESG、營運、策略課程個案分析
不適用
- 純理論層的永續策略 → Asgard
grad-sustainability - 財務報表分析 → Asgard
biz-financial-ratios、data-financial-analysis - ESG 投資組合設計 → 另找投資分析工具
- 個別技術(如熱泵、儲能)深度 → 需產業工程團隊
IRON LAW — 淨零轉型的三條鐵律
IRON LAW 1:沒有盤查就沒有減碳
多數企業先喊「2050 淨零」才補盤查,結果目標與實況脫節。
正確順序:
範疇 1/2 盤查(6–12 個月) → 範疇 3 熱點識別 →
基準年確定 → 目標設定(SBTi 對齊) →
路徑規劃 → 揭露 → 執行 → 年度驗證
IRON LAW 2:範疇 3 才是真正的戰場
多數製造業範疇 3(上下游)占總碳排 70–95%。
只減範疇 1(直接)+ 範疇 2(電力)無法達成淨零。
供應鏈參與(Scope 3 Engagement)是關鍵且最困難的環節。
IRON LAW 3:減碳是財務決策,不只是永續決策
沒有內部碳定價(Internal Carbon Pricing)的組織,
永續部門提什麼都是「花錢」;
有內部碳定價的組織,減碳變成「CFO 的投資組合問題」。
淨零轉型的治理高度 = CFO 深度介入 + 董事會納入議程。
Rationalization Table — 當 Claude 想「本案例外」時,先自問
| 可能想 | 但 Iron Law 仍適用,因為 |
|---|---|
| 「先給公司設 2050 淨零目標,盤查後續再補」 | 無盤查的目標只是口號;必須先標註「未完成盤查前目標僅為意向性,不具承諾效力」 |
| 「範疇 3 太複雜,先做範疇 1+2 就好」 | 製造業範疇 3 常佔 70–95%;只減 1+2 無法達成淨零,報告需明示「範疇 3 為最大未處理缺口」 |
| 「永續部門在推減碳,CFO 不必深入」 | 無內部碳定價,永續提案恆被視為「花錢」;建議將碳定價納入 capex / 採購 / 定價決策 |
流程總覽
Step 1:溫室氣體盤查(GHG Inventory)
├─ 範疇 1:直接排放(鍋爐、車輛、製程、冷媒)
├─ 範疇 2:外購電力(市場基礎 / 位置基礎)
└─ 範疇 3:價值鏈(15 大類、通常占 70%+)
Step 2:熱點分析與目標設定
├─ 熱點識別(Material Categories)
├─ 基準年 / 目標年確定
└─ SBTi 對齊(1.5°C / Well-below 2°C)
Step 3:減碳路徑(Decarbonization Pathway)
├─ 能源效率
├─ 電氣化
├─ 再生能源(自發自用、PPA、T-REC)
├─ 製程革新
├─ 供應鏈參與
└─ 碳移除(Offset / Removal,最後手段)
Step 4:揭露(TCFD → ISSB S1/S2)
├─ 治理、策略、風險管理、指標與目標
└─ 情境分析(1.5°C / 2°C / 4°C)
Step 5:內部治理
├─ 內部碳定價
├─ 永續 KPI 連結薪酬
├─ 董事會與永續委員會
└─ 跨部門協作機制
Step 6:驗證與溝通
├─ 第三方查證(ISO 14064-3)
├─ 客戶問卷回應(CDP、EcoVadis)
└─ 投資人溝通(永續報告書、法說會)
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 452 lines · 285 tokens per session scan A 838a2ff0dc77
"biz-net-zero-transition" is a skill published in the GitHub repository charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill (26 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 285 tokens to every session and 6,875 once invoked, about $0.0014 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to biz-net-zero-transition, differing in 9 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
compliance-tracker
Track regulatory compliance for construction projects. Monitor permits, certifications, inspections, and regulatory requirements with automated alerts and reporting.
safety-inspection-checklist
Digital safety inspection checklists for construction sites. Generate, conduct, and track safety inspections with automated reporting and compliance monitoring.
delay-analysis
Analyze construction schedule delays for claims and recovery. Perform time impact analysis, identify delay causes, calculate damages, and document for disputes.
change-order-manager
Manage construction change orders from request to approval. Track costs, schedule impacts, and maintain audit trail for dispute prevention.
claims-documentation
Document construction claims for disputes and recovery. Compile evidence, calculate damages, track notice requirements, and prepare claim packages.
contract-clause-extractor
Extract and analyze key clauses from construction contracts. Identify payment terms, change order procedures, dispute resolution, warranties, and risk allocation provisions.