Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Chemaclass/agnostic-ai --skill agnostic-ai-gh-issuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Chemaclass/agnostic-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chemaclass/agnostic-ai/agnostic-ai-gh-issue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chemaclass/agnostic-ai/agnostic-ai-gh-issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chemaclass/agnostic-ai/agnostic-ai-gh-issue/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chemaclass/agnostic-ai/agnostic-ai-gh-issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chemaclass/agnostic-ai/agnostic-ai-gh-issue.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01209 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00484 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00242 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00121 |
Grade A, and why
agnostic-ai-gh-issue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GitHub Issue Workflow
Context
Read both the issue body and every comment as requirements input. Maintainer follow-ups often add scope or edge cases, or override the original description; when a later comment conflicts with the body, prefer the comment.
::target claude
!gh issue view ${ARGUMENTS#\#} --json number,url,title,body,labels,assignees,state,comments 2>/dev/null || echo "Provide an issue number"
::end
Read the issue first: gh issue view <number> --json number,url,title,body,labels,assignees,state,comments.
Instructions
Phase 1: Setup
-
Parse the issue number from the text passed after the skill name (strip
#if present). -
Assign yourself if unassigned:
gh issue edit <number> --add-assignee @me -
Create a branch from fresh
origin/mainbased on the issue type:Check that the worktree is clean. Fetch
origin/main, stop if localmainhas unpublished commits, then fast-forward it. Never discard local work.Determine the branch prefix from labels:
bug→fix/enhancement→feat/documentation→docs/- No label →
feat/(default)
Branch name format:
<prefix><issue-number>-<slug>test -z "$(git status --porcelain)" || exit 1 git fetch origin main git switch main test "$(git rev-list --count origin/main..main)" -eq 0 || exit 1 git pull --ff-only git switch -c <branch-name>
Phase 2: Design
-
Design the implementation before editing:
- Explore the codebase to understand affected areas.
- Identify files that need changes.
- Respect adapter independence:
.agnostic-ai/rules/no-cross-adapter-imports.md. - Honor the adapter skeleton:
.agnostic-ai/rules/adapter-pattern.md. - Plan the TDD approach (what tests to write first).
-
Keep a short implementation plan with:
- Summary of what the issue requires.
- List of files to create/modify.
- Test strategy (unit per package, integration under
tests/integration). - Step-by-step implementation order.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed 2b6d79e1b9cb
- 10d ago First seen · 102 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A e375129bfdc3
agnostic-ai-gh-issue is a skill published in the GitHub repository Chemaclass/agnostic-ai (25 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,209 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-06.
Other skills, from other repositories
workflow-patterns
Use this skill when implementing tasks according to Conductor's TDD workflow, handling phase checkpoints, managing git commits for tasks, or understanding the verification protocol.
nw-quality-framework
Quality gates - 11 commit readiness gates, build/test protocol, validation checkpoints, and quality metrics.
cmux-testing
Choose scoped cmux verification, add behavioral tests, and validate Swift test targets and wiring. Use when adding tests or deciding what local/CI evidence a change needs.
strict-tdd
Strict RED->GREEN->REFACTOR test-driven development with enforcement. Never write production code before a failing test. Atomic commits per TDD cycle.
sup-coding
Coding workflow recipe (brainstorm → design → spec → plan → implement → review → verify → finish).
rig-task
Implement one unit of work end-to-end — from a tracker issue OR an ad-hoc description: spec review, TDD (RED→GREEN→REFACTOR), pre-PR self-review, open a PR, then drive the review-bot loop to clean. Runs start→finish in one shot by default; start/finish are optional phases for pause/resume. Sibling to /rig-epic (one…