Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/chemany/mente/peftnpx skills add chemany/Mente --skill peftgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chemany/MenteWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00082 | $0.03470 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.01735 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00694 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00347 |
Grade A, and why
peft-fine-tuning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to peft-fine-tuning — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 435 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PEFT (Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning)
Fine-tune LLMs by training <1% of parameters using LoRA, QLoRA, and 25+ adapter methods.
When to use PEFT
Use PEFT/LoRA when:
- Fine-tuning 7B-70B models on consumer GPUs (RTX 4090, A100)
- Need to train <1% parameters (6MB adapters vs 14GB full model)
- Want fast iteration with multiple task-specific adapters
- Deploying multiple fine-tuned variants from one base model
Use QLoRA (PEFT + quantization) when:
- Fine-tuning 70B models on single 24GB GPU
- Memory is the primary constraint
- Can accept ~5% quality trade-off vs full fine-tuning
Use full fine-tuning instead when:
- Training small models (<1B parameters)
- Need maximum quality and have compute budget
- Significant domain shift requires updating all weights
Quick start
Installation
# Basic installation
pip install peft
# With quantization support (recommended)
pip install peft bitsandbytes
# Full stack
pip install peft transformers accelerate bitsandbytes datasets
LoRA fine-tuning (standard)
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer, TrainingArguments, Trainer
from peft import get_peft_model, LoraConfig, TaskType
from datasets import load_dataset
# Load base model
model_name = "meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B"
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name, torch_dtype="auto", device_map="auto")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token
# LoRA configuration
lora_config = LoraConfig(
task_type=TaskType.CAUSAL_LM,
r=16, # Rank (8-64, higher = more capacity)
lora_alpha=32, # Scaling factor (typically 2*r)
lora_dropout=0.05, # Dropout for regularization
target_modules=["q_proj", "v_proj", "k_proj", "o_proj"], # Attention layers
bias="none" # Don't train biases
)
# Apply LoRA
model = get_peft_model(model, lora_config)
model.print_trainable_parameters()
# Output: trainable params: 13,631,488 || all params: 8,043,307,008 || trainable%: 0.17%
# Prepare dataset
dataset = load_dataset("databricks/databricks-dolly-15k", split="train")
def tokenize(example):
text = f"### Instruction:\n{example['instruction']}\n\n### Response:\n{example['response']}"
return tokenizer(text, truncation=True, max_length=512, padding="max_length")
tokenized = dataset.map(tokenize, remove_columns=dataset.column_names)
# Training
training_args = TrainingArguments(
output_dir="./lora-llama",
num_train_epochs=3,
per_device_train_batch_size=4,
gradient_accumulation_steps=4,
learning_rate=2e-4,
fp16=True,
logging_steps=10,
save_strategy="epoch"
)
trainer = Trainer(
model=model,
args=training_args,
train_dataset=tokenized,
data_collator=lambda data: {"input_ids": torch.stack([f["input_ids"] for f in data]),
"attention_mask": torch.stack([f["attention_mask"] for f in data]),
"labels": torch.stack([f["input_ids"] for f in data])}
)
trainer.train()
# Save adapter only (6MB vs 16GB)
model.save_pretrained("./lora-llama-adapter")
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 435 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 79ec7275734c
peft-fine-tuning is a skill published in the GitHub repository chemany/Mente (11 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 3,470 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to peft-fine-tuning, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…