Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cherninlab/ennodia --skill compositional-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cherninlab/ennodiaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cherninlab/ennodia/compositional-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cherninlab/ennodia/compositional-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cherninlab/ennodia/compositional-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cherninlab/ennodia/compositional-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cherninlab/ennodia/compositional-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00221 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00088 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00044 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
compositional-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Compositional Audit
Use this when a large plan, implementation, document set, or product decision should be reviewed in small independent pieces before synthesis.
If you are reviewing one slice:
- Stay inside the assigned slice and source list.
- Do not re-audit the whole project unless the slice asks for it.
- Separate source-backed facts from judgment.
- Name the strongest risk first.
- Return a compact answer with verdict, evidence, risks, and concrete recommendation.
- Flag missing source access instead of filling gaps with guesses.
- Keep the output short enough for a later Compare pass.
If you are synthesizing shard answers:
- Preserve disagreements instead of flattening them.
- Treat failed, empty, or access-limited shards as non-signal.
- Prefer recommendations that are supported by more than one shard or by the strongest source evidence.
- Name the smallest next action that would reduce the most risk.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 28 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A bbfd4c2bc416
compositional-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository cherninlab/ennodia (6 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 221 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
post-processing
Extract, analyze, and summarize simulation output data — pull spatial fields at specific timesteps, compute time-series trends and detect steady state, extract line profiles through the domain, generate statistical summaries and distributions, calculate derived quantities (gradients, fluxes, volume fractions…
nonlinear-solvers
Select and configure nonlinear solvers for root-finding f(x)=0, optimization min F(x), and least-squares problems — choose among Newton, Newton-Krylov, quasi-Newton (BFGS, L-BFGS), Broyden, Anderson acceleration, and Levenberg-Marquardt methods, configure line search or trust-region globalization, diagnose convergence…
ontology-explorer
Parse, navigate, and query materials science ontology structures — browse class hierarchies, inspect individual classes and their properties, look up object and data property definitions with domain/range, search for ontology terms by keyword, and parse or summarize raw OWL/XML files. Currently supports CMSO and ASMO…
performance-profiling
Identify computational bottlenecks, analyze parallel scaling, estimate memory requirements, and generate optimization recommendations for materials simulations — parse timing logs to find dominant phases (solver, assembly, I/O), evaluate strong and weak scaling efficiency, profile memory from mesh and field…
simulation-orchestrator
Orchestrate multi-simulation campaigns — generate parameter sweep configurations (grid, linspace, or Latin Hypercube sampling), initialize and track batch job campaigns, monitor job completion status, and aggregate results with summary statistics across all runs. Use when running a parameter study across dt, kappa, or…
simulation-validator
Validate simulations across three stages — run pre-flight checks on configuration files (parameter ranges, required fields, disk space), monitor runtime logs for residual growth, NaN/Inf, and adaptive dt collapse, and perform post-flight validation of results (physical bounds, mass/energy conservation, convergence).…