Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/cherryhq/stella/coss-particlesnpx skills add CherryHQ/stella --skill coss-particlesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CherryHQ/stellaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cherryhq/stella/coss-particles)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cherryhq/stella/coss-particles"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cherryhq/stella/coss-particles.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.12105 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.06052 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.02421 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.01210 |
Grade A, and why
coss-particles scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 741 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 0ed0cb426518
coss-particles is a skill published in the GitHub repository CherryHQ/stella (50 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 12,105 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
crawlkit
Maintain and release the crawlkit Go library, preserving downstream compatibility for gitcrawl, slacrawl, discrawl, and notcrawl.
go-code-review
Use when reviewing Go code or checking code against community style standards. Also use proactively before submitting a Go PR or when reviewing any Go code changes, even if the user doesn't explicitly request a style review. Does not cover language-specific syntax — delegates to specialized skills.
go-concurrency
Use when writing concurrent Go code — goroutines, channels, mutexes, or thread-safety guarantees. Also use when parallelizing work, fixing data races, or protecting shared state, even if the user doesn't explicitly mention concurrency primitives. Does not cover context.Context patterns (see go-context).
go-defensive
Use when hardening Go code at API boundaries — copying slices/maps, verifying interface compliance, using defer for cleanup, time.Time/time.Duration, or avoiding mutable globals. Also use when reviewing for robustness concerns like missing cleanup or unsafe crypto usage, even if the user doesn't mention "defensive…
go-error-handling
Use when writing Go code that returns, wraps, or handles errors — choosing between sentinel errors, custom types, and fmt.Errorf (%w vs %v), structuring error flow, or deciding whether to log or return. Also use when propagating errors across package boundaries or using errors.Is/As, even if the user doesn't ask about…
go-interfaces
Use when defining or implementing Go interfaces, designing abstractions, creating mockable boundaries for testing, or composing types through embedding. Also use when deciding whether to accept an interface or return a concrete type, or using type assertions or type switches, even if the user doesn't explicitly…