Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/cherryhq/stella/weekly-deliverynpx skills add CherryHQ/stella --skill weekly-deliverygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CherryHQ/stellaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cherryhq/stella/weekly-delivery)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cherryhq/stella/weekly-delivery"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cherryhq/stella/weekly-delivery.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.02317 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01158 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00463 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00232 |
Grade A, and why
weekly-delivery scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 191 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 04cb5f4556f5
weekly-delivery is a skill published in the GitHub repository CherryHQ/stella (50 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 2,317 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
crawlkit
Maintain and release the crawlkit Go library, preserving downstream compatibility for gitcrawl, slacrawl, discrawl, and notcrawl.
ship
Commit and push the current work properly — lint, run the release gate, write a detailed commit message, push to GitHub. Use whenever work reaches a milestone or the user says ship it, commit, or push.
pre-release-check
The final gate before a release is cut — go green, reconcile the release PR against what actually landed, sweep what CI can't see, check the roadmap and ADR statuses, optionally deep-review, then return a ship-or-hold verdict.
go-code-review
Use when reviewing Go code or checking code against community style standards. Also use proactively before submitting a Go PR or when reviewing any Go code changes, even if the user doesn't explicitly request a style review. Does not cover language-specific syntax — delegates to specialized skills.
go-defensive
Use when hardening Go code at API boundaries — copying slices/maps, verifying interface compliance, using defer for cleanup, time.Time/time.Duration, or avoiding mutable globals. Also use when reviewing for robustness concerns like missing cleanup or unsafe crypto usage, even if the user doesn't mention "defensive…
go-error-handling
Use when writing Go code that returns, wraps, or handles errors — choosing between sentinel errors, custom types, and fmt.Errorf (%w vs %v), structuring error flow, or deciding whether to log or return. Also use when propagating errors across package boundaries or using errors.Is/As, even if the user doesn't ask about…