verifying-bibliography

verifying-bibliography is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from chgagne/claude-skills-research. It costs 88 tokens per session (2,489 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A reference-checking guide for finding incorrect, fabricated, or mismatched entries in a BibTeX file or bibliography. It checks details such as titles, authors, DOIs, publication venues, and page information against stable records.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to verify a .bib file or reference list before submitting a paper, especially when checking whether citations exist and whether their bibliographic details match the original publications.
Why use it?
It helps catch citations that look plausible but point to a different paper, contain invented details, or refer to a preprint instead of the published work.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths.

Good fit Use it to verify a .bib file or reference list before submitting a paper, especially when checking whether citations exist and whether their bibliographic details match the original publications.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/chgagne/claude-skills-research/verifying-bibliography
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add chgagne/claude-skills-research --skill verifying-bibliography
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chgagne/claude-skills-research

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for verifying-bibliography

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chgagne/claude-skills-research/verifying-bibliography/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chgagne/claude-skills-research/verifying-bibliography)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chgagne/claude-skills-research/verifying-bibliography"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chgagne/claude-skills-research/verifying-bibliography/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for verifying-bibliography

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chgagne/claude-skills-research/verifying-bibliography"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chgagne/claude-skills-research/verifying-bibliography.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 88 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,489 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00088 $0.02489
Opus 5 $0.00044 $0.01244
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00498
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00249

Measured 12d ago against content hash dc069adfdd4d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

verifying-bibliography scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 19 executable files (assets/bibcheck/__init__.py, assets/bibcheck/__main__.py, assets/bibcheck/bibparse.py, …), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

verifying-bibliography/SKILL.md · 190 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 190 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Verifying Bibliography

Overview

Resolve a stable identifier first, then compare the record back against the .bib. Everything else in this skill follows from that one inversion.

The obvious design — take the title in the .bib, search for it, fuzzy-match the authors — cannot detect the single most important defect. A fabricated title that accurately describes the right paper retrieves that paper and passes. Searching by the thing you are trying to verify is circular.

Two measured examples, both cleared by a title-search tool and both caught by reverse lookup:

  • moritz2019draco carried the title "Draco: An Approach to Generating Visualizations with a Computational Design Process". Its DOI is correct and resolves to "Formalizing Visualization Design Knowledge as Constraints: Actionable and Extensible Models in Draco".
  • wongsuphasawat2016voyager carried DOI 10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467251, which resolves to "High-Quality Ultra-Compact Grid Layout of Grouped Networks" — a different paper by six different authors.

Run it

python3 ~/.claude/skills/verifying-bibliography/assets/run-bibcheck.py \
    refs.bib --bbl main.bbl --out review-assets/

Run it by absolute path from the paper directory. Stdlib only — no install, no venv, no dependencies. (python3 -m bibcheck also works, but only from <skill>/assets/.)

  • --bbl main.bbl restricts checking to entries actually cited (the .bbl is ground truth for "cited", because it reflects the built document rather than every \cite including commented-out ones)
  • --out DIR writes bibcheck-report.md and bibdiff.csv
  • Exit code 2 means source coverage was degraded — see When a source is down

Optional: S2_API_KEY in the environment, or ~/.config/scholarly/s2_key. Semantic Scholar sits last in the ladder; on two real bibliographies it changed nothing. Absent, it is silently skipped and nothing breaks.

The ladder

1. DOI            -> Crossref /works/{doi}      authoritative, reverse check
2. arXiv DOI      -> arXiv API                  10.48550/* is DataCite, absent from Crossref
3. arXiv id       -> arXiv API
4. ACL DOI        -> aclanthology.org via Crossref
5. no identifier  -> DBLP by title              the CS/ML spine
6. still nothing  -> OpenAlex, then Semantic Scholar

Read the full file on GitHub · 190 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 190 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A dc069adfdd4d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

verifying-bibliography is a skill published in the GitHub repository chgagne/claude-skills-research (4 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 2,489 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.