why

why is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from chhoumann/t3-pstack. It costs 89 tokens per session (2,215 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An evidence-gathering workflow for explaining why code or technical decisions exist. It searches connected sources such as version control, issue trackers, documents, chat, monitoring, error tracking, and product data.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to investigate design rationale, understand why a change was made, trace a regression, or support a decision with project evidence.
Why use it?
It replaces guesswork about design choices, regressions, postmortems, and thresholds with information from project records.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter, but also reads $CODEX_HOME. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions subagents; mentions Claude Code.

Part of the t3-pstack plugin — 62 skills, 4 agents, 1 hook shipped together

Good fit Use it to investigate design rationale, understand why a change was made, trace a regression, or support a decision with project evidence.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/chhoumann/t3-pstack/why
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add chhoumann/t3-pstack --skill why
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chhoumann/t3-pstack

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install t3-pstack, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 62 skills, 4 agents, 1 hook.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for why

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chhoumann/t3-pstack/why/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chhoumann/t3-pstack/why)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chhoumann/t3-pstack/why"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chhoumann/t3-pstack/why/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for why

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chhoumann/t3-pstack/why"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chhoumann/t3-pstack/why.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 89 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,215 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00089 $0.02215
Opus 5.5 $0.00036 $0.00886
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00018 $0.00443
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00221

Measured yesterday against content hash 32c6839d50df, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

why scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

  • why — 92% identical, 19 lines differ
  • why — 84% identical, 21 lines differ
plugins/pstack/skills/why/SKILL.md · 106 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Why

Investigate the motivation and intent behind code. The companion how skill answers what the code does and how it works. why answers what forces led to its shape.

Each spawn below names a role line in the model sheet and a default. Set target from that line's entry, or from the default if the sheet or the line is missing. Leave target unset when the value is auto or inherit-parent. If delegate_task rejects an entry, use the default and say so. If it rejects the default, use another target of the same family from orchestrator_capabilities. Pick each subagent's reasoning level and fast or standard speed for the job, per the Subagents section of the poteto-mode skill.

Every spawn is a delegate_task child with full tool access, MCP included, which the MCP-backed investigators and the synthesizer's citation spot-checks need. Investigators still shouldn't write anything.

Operating Posture

Operate as a careful, cautious, and precise investigator. Be honest about what you know vs what you're inferring. Read references/epistemics.md for the full confidence framework and phrasing guide. The synthesizer must follow it.

Step 1. Understand the Target and the Question

The target is usually a chunk of code, a pattern, a feature, or a named design decision. The question is usually a design rationale, a tradeoff, a motivating edge case, an external constraint, dead code, or a broad history sweep.

If the target is vague ("why do we do it this way?" with no clear referent), make your best guess from conversation context (open files, recent edits, cursor location, what was just discussed). State your interpretation briefly so the user can redirect if you're off, then proceed.

Step 2. Establish the Code Anchor

Before spawning investigators, build the seed context inline: file paths and line ranges, key symbols (functions, classes, constants), the last few commits touching the target, PR numbers from merge commits (pattern (#1234) in the subject line), and any linked ticket IDs. Run git blame -L <start>,<end> <file> for last-touch commits, git log --follow -p -- <file> for full history with patches through renames, git log --oneline -20 -- <file> for recent commits with PR numbers visible, and git log -1 --format=%B <commit> to extract PR numbers. Then pull the PR bodies and discussion for any substantive commit: gh pr view <number> --json title,body,author,createdAt,mergedAt,labels,closingIssuesReferences,comments,reviews. This anchor goes to every investigator and to the synthesizer.

Read the full file on GitHub · 106 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday Changed · -7 lines 32c6839d50df
  2. 3d ago First seen · 113 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A 28405f218aaf

Subscribe to this mod's changes

why is a skill published in the GitHub repository chhoumann/t3-pstack (190 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 89 tokens to every session and 2,215 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-13.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

debug-optimize-lcp

Guides debugging and optimizing Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks about LCP performance, slow page loads, Core Web Vitals optimization, or wants to understand why their page's main content takes too long to appear. Also use when the user mentions…

ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp · 99 tokens

systematic-debugging

Use when debugging a failing test, build error, or runtime issue that isn't immediately obvious. Guides a 4-phase root cause analysis instead of random fix attempts.

open-metadata/OpenMetadata · 37 tokens

diagnose

Trace from a reproduced symptom to the source code that causes it. Pin the specific file and approximate line, rate confidence in the cause and clarity of the fix independently, and always propose a concrete fix.

emdash-cms/emdash · 43 tokens

repro-admin

Reproduce an EmDash admin UI bug. Attach a container, start the demo dev server, drive the admin with agent-browser using the dev-bypass session, and capture the reproduction as screenshots plus a replayable transcript.

emdash-cms/emdash · 48 tokens

log-error-digest

Analyze log files to troubleshoot errors, identify peak error periods, and produce error clustering, frequency statistics, and time distribution reports. Supports JSON, syslog, and Nginx formats with automatic detection. Use when a user uploads a .log file and asks to analyze errors, find patterns, debug issues, or…

zebbern/claude-code-guide · 71 tokens

deck-retro

Run a fully local agent-deck retrospective over the user's own transcripts, Recall index and logs. Use when a user wants to find recurring failures or take their own finding from investigation through synthetic reproduction, a user-filed issue, a test-first fix and contributor PR handoff. Also use for weekly usage…

asheshgoplani/agent-deck · 86 tokens