Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add chinkan/RustFox --skill resolving-merge-conflictsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chinkan/RustFoxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chinkan/rustfox/resolving-merge-conflicts)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chinkan/rustfox/resolving-merge-conflicts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chinkan/rustfox/resolving-merge-conflicts/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chinkan/rustfox/resolving-merge-conflicts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chinkan/rustfox/resolving-merge-conflicts.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00204 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00082 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00041 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
resolving-merge-conflicts scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
84% identical to resolve-merge-conflict — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
-
See the current state of the merge/rebase. Check git history, and the conflicting files.
-
Find the primary sources for each conflict. Understand deeply why each change was made, and what the original intent was. Read the commit messages, check the PRs, check original issues/tickets.
-
Resolve each hunk. Preserve both intents where possible. Where incompatible, pick the one matching the merge's stated goal and note the trade-off. Do not invent new behaviour. Always resolve; never
--abort. -
Discover the project's automated checks and run them, typically typecheck, then tests, then format. Fix anything the merge broke.
-
Finish the merge/rebase. Stage everything and commit. If rebasing, continue the rebase process until all commits are rebased.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 9d8114f8ef0b
- 1mo ago First seen · 15 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A c7c9ba81362a
resolving-merge-conflicts is a skill published in the GitHub repository chinkan/RustFox (10 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 204 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 84% identical to resolve-merge-conflict, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
apply-patch
Apply multi-file or tricky edits atomically with git apply instead of many fragile editfile calls. Use when changing several files at once or when editfile fails to match.
git-checkpoint
Use git as a safety net - create a checkpoint commit before risky or large changes and roll back cleanly if a change makes things worse. Use before multi-file refactors.
commit
Create git commits with good messages. Use when user says "commit", "create commit", or asks to commit changes.
public-plugin-packaging
Use when packaging an Agentlas agent repo for public GitHub release, Codex plugin submission, Claude adapter distribution, or one-line terminal installation.
release-notes
Write release notes for a tagged release — a business-impact summary of what changed for the user, plus a thanks section naming every contributor whose commits are in the release. Short by construction.
review-this-branch
Run the nohuman review gate (fresh-session adversarial reviewer + tamper guard) over the current branch or a GitHub pull request, with no server, no database, and no onboarding, and relay the pass/fail checklist.