Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add chiruu12/OSS-Skills --skill oss-submit-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chiruu12/OSS-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chiruu12/oss-skills/oss-submit-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chiruu12/oss-skills/oss-submit-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chiruu12/oss-skills/oss-submit-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chiruu12/oss-skills/oss-submit-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chiruu12/oss-skills/oss-submit-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.03360 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.01344 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00672 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00336 |
Grade A, and why
oss-submit-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 326 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Submit PR
Get your PR right the first time. This skill checks your work against the repo's rules, catches common rejection reasons, and helps you write a PR description that maintainers actually want to read. You write the description. the LLM reviews it.
Purpose
A clean PR gets reviewed and merged. A sloppy PR gets ignored or closed. Most new contributors get rejected not because their code is bad, but because they didn't follow the process. wrong branch, missing tests, unclear description, scope creep. This skill catches all of that before you hit submit.
Prerequisites
- Implementation complete (from
oss-contribute) - Tests pass locally
- Lint/formatting passes locally
- User can explain what they changed and why (verified in
oss-contributestep 6)
Process
1. Re-read contribution requirements
Even if oss-prep-to-contribute already read these, read them again. specifically for PR submission rules:
# Fetch latest CONTRIBUTING.md
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents/CONTRIBUTING.md --jq '.content' | base64 -d 2>/dev/null
# Check for PR template - all standard locations
for path in \
".github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md" \
".github/pull_request_template.md" \
"PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md" \
"pull_request_template.md" \
"docs/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md" \
"docs/pull_request_template.md"; do
if content=$(gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents/$path" --jq '.content' 2>/dev/null); then
printf '%s' "$content" | base64 -d 2>/dev/null
break
fi
done
# Check for multiple PR templates (directory-based)
gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE" \
--jq '.[] | .name' 2>/dev/null
If a single template is found: use it. The PR description must follow its structure exactly.
If a template directory exists with multiple templates: present each template name to the user and ask which one matches their contribution type (bug fix, feature, docs, etc.). Fetch the selected template and use it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 326 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A e5a2f39cad00
oss-submit-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository chiruu12/OSS-Skills (61 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 3,360 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
babysit
Watch an open PR — fix failing CI, handle the straightforward review comments, and drive it to a mergeable state. Claude Code analog of Cursor's built-in /babysit. Use after opening a PR when the user wants the agent to shepherd it without re-prompting.
make-pr-easy-to-review
Prepare PRs for review by cleaning noisy history, improving PR descriptions, and adding reviewer guidance without changing code behavior. Use for "make this easy to review", "tidy this PR", "clean up commits", or "annotate the diff".
pr-review
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.
phx-pr-review
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.
ln-52-delivery-reviewer
Reviews a completed change for acceptance, regressions and release risk; read-only, not a whole-codebase audit.
ln-64-community-announcer
Drafts or publishes authorized, fact-checked GitHub Discussions announcements; does not create releases.