Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ChloeVPin/open-agent-skills --skill differential-patch-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ChloeVPin/open-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chloevpin/open-agent-skills/differential-patch-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chloevpin/open-agent-skills/differential-patch-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chloevpin/open-agent-skills/differential-patch-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chloevpin/open-agent-skills/differential-patch-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chloevpin/open-agent-skills/differential-patch-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00894 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00447 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00179 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
differential-patch-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 67 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 991245ac97ed
differential-patch-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ChloeVPin/open-agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed 4d ago), with no licence file. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 894 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ase-code-lint
Lint source code for potential code quality problems. Use when the user wants to "lint" or "check" source code.
gjalla-cleanup-audit
Audit a codebase for dead code, unreachable branches, duplicated logic, and vestigial abstractions, then remove them safely with proof. Use to reduce sprawl, pay down tech debt, or clean up after a feature is retired or migrated.
patch-edit
Apply one rewrite-plan step at a time as small reviewable file edits, never rewriting whole files when a localised change suffices.
omc-review
Evaluate finished work for defects, risk, and simplification before it ships.
skeptical-triage
Reusable 3-round self-challenge + arbiter pattern for filtering false positives from findings/verdicts. Use when the cost of a false-positive gate block exceeds the cost of 4 extra LLM turns.
anti-patterns
Catalogue of known SDLC anti-patterns that greatcto agents must actively reject when reviewing architecture, plans, code, or post-mortems. Used by architect (pre-impl), pm (planning), senior-dev (impl), l3-support (post-incident).