Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Chloris-Blaxk/inno-agent-hub --skill formative-assessment-technique-selectorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Chloris-Blaxk/inno-agent-hubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chloris-blaxk/inno-agent-hub/formative-assessment-technique-selector)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chloris-blaxk/inno-agent-hub/formative-assessment-technique-selector"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chloris-blaxk/inno-agent-hub/formative-assessment-technique-selector/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chloris-blaxk/inno-agent-hub/formative-assessment-technique-selector"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chloris-blaxk/inno-agent-hub/formative-assessment-technique-selector.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00157 | $0.04417 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00078 | $0.02209 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00883 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00442 |
Grade A, and why
formative-assessment-technique-selector scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +2 lines 8199c089b943
- 12d ago First seen · 256 lines · 157 tokens per session scan A 6cdd80c8b19a
formative-assessment-technique-selector is a skill published in the GitHub repository Chloris-Blaxk/inno-agent-hub (12 stars, last pushed 5d ago), with no licence file. It adds 157 tokens to every session and 4,417 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
formative-assessment-technique-selector
Select the right formative assessment technique for a specific learning moment, purpose, and age group. Use when choosing how to check understanding during, between, or after lessons.
checking-for-understanding-protocol-designer
Design a checking-for-understanding protocol with specific techniques for each lesson stage. Use when planning systematic comprehension checks during explicit or direct instruction.
formative-assessment-loop-designer
Design an adaptive assessment loop where each student response triggers the next instructional move. Use when building technology-enhanced formative assessment cycles.
gap-analysis-from-student-work
Analyse student work against criteria to identify specific gaps between current performance and learning objectives. Use when reviewing submissions, planning feedback, or diagnosing learning needs.
feedback-quality-analyser
Analyse existing written feedback for quality, specificity, actionability, and impact on student learning. Use when reviewing teacher or peer feedback to improve feedback practices.
hinge-question-designer
Design a diagnostic hinge question that reveals whether students understand enough to move on. Use when planning key checkpoints mid-lesson during explicit or direct instruction.