Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to choi138/toki. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/choi138/toki/main/.agents/skills/project-conventions/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/choi138/tokiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/choi138/toki/project-conventions)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/choi138/toki/project-conventions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/choi138/toki/project-conventions/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/choi138/toki/project-conventions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/choi138/toki/project-conventions.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00381 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00152 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00076 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
project-conventions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Project Conventions
Review these rules before editing Toki code or project configuration.
When To Activate
- Before editing
menubar/Toki/**/*.swift - Before editing
menubar/TokiTests/**/*.swift - Before changing
menubar/project.yml,menubar/Toki.xcodeproj,.swiftformat, or.swiftlint.yml - When working on usage readers, pricing, aggregation, security audit scanning, SwiftUI feature screens, app launch/menu bar behavior, or tests
Read First
Open the shared conventions entry point first:
Read: .agents/skills/project-conventions/conventions.md
Then load only the reference files that match the current task.
Reference Map
references/architecture.md: app directory ownership, data flow, reader and security audit boundaries, SwiftUI feature boundaries.references/swift-style.md: Swift style, SwiftUI guidance, sensitive local data handling, formatter/linter expectations.references/testing-verification.md: focused and full validation commands.
Workflow
- Read
conventions.md. - Read the relevant task-specific reference.
- Inspect the existing pattern in the nearest files.
- Implement with narrowly scoped changes.
- Run focused checks or explain why they could not be run.
Use AGENTS.md for repo-level policy and .agents/conventions/git-workflow.md
for commit and PR workflow rules.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 53 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 8e698d36c21b
project-conventions is a skill published in the GitHub repository choi138/toki (9 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 381 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
oculpm-journal
A work-journal format for recording coding-agent tasks, including bugs, features, errors, refactors, and chores. It defines where files go and what information each record must contain.
redteam
A red-team checker for plans and work journals that tests their verifiable claims against source files, commands, logs, database rows, or Git changes. Red-teaming means deliberately looking for counterexamples rather than assuming a claim is correct.
memory
Project memory management. Modes: (1) 'recall' — project-memory recall when session context is needed, (2) 'update' — project memory evaluation before git commit, (3) 'consolidate' — merge redundant entries and retire outdated ones.
next
A planned implementation loop that selects the next unfinished task, implements it, checks the result, records a work note, and updates the plan.
help
A reference guide to the ocul-pm commands, tools, skills, and automatic hooks. Hooks are automatic actions triggered by events such as starting or ending a session.
inception
A project-starting workflow for researching a new idea, agreeing on its requirements, and turning it into a detailed three-level plan.