Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ChrisGVE/localdata-mcp --skill optimizationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ChrisGVE/localdata-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chrisgve/localdata-mcp/optimization)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chrisgve/localdata-mcp/optimization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chrisgve/localdata-mcp/optimization.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00507 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00253 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00101 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
optimization scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 49 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Optimization
Formulate and solve optimization problems from data — resource allocation, scheduling, cost minimization, or process tuning.
Steps
-
Understand the objective. From the user's question, identify what is being optimized (minimize cost, maximize throughput, best allocation) and what the constraints are (budget limits, capacity, time windows, quality thresholds).
-
Extract problem data. Call
describe_databasewith the database name from$ARGUMENTS. Identify tables containing:- Decision variables (what can be changed)
- Objective coefficients (costs, profits, rates)
- Constraint parameters (capacities, limits, requirements)
-
Profile the data. Call
execute_queryto pull the relevant values. Verify completeness withget_data_quality_report. Missing constraint data makes optimization unreliable. -
Formulate the problem. Translate the data into an optimization formulation:
- Objective function (linear or nonlinear)
- Decision variables and their bounds
- Constraints (equality and inequality)
- Report the formulation clearly before solving
-
Solve. Apply the appropriate optimization approach (available when optimization domain tools are exposed):
- Linear programming for linear objectives and constraints
- Constrained optimization for nonlinear problems
- Assignment problems for matching tasks to resources
- Network optimization for flow and routing
-
Analyze the solution. Examine:
- Optimal objective value
- Decision variable values at the optimum
- Which constraints are binding (at their limit) vs. slack
- Sensitivity: how much would the objective change if a constraint were relaxed?
-
Validate against reality. Call
execute_queryto compare the optimal solution against historical performance. Is the improvement realistic? Are there practical constraints the model does not capture? -
Present results. Provide:
- Problem formulation summary
- Optimal solution with all variable values
- Objective value and improvement over baseline
- Binding constraints and sensitivity analysis
- Implementation recommendations and caveats
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 49 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 0e150fd9f6ca
optimization is a skill published in the GitHub repository ChrisGVE/localdata-mcp (4 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 507 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
wingman-mcp
Add persistent, interactive task plan management to your agent. Wingman tracks plans and tasks across a long conversation — Claude creates plans, ticks tasks after completing work, and a live panel renders inline in the chat. Install the MCP server first, then use these tools to manage plans and tasks throughout any…
liveagent-code-review
Review an open GitHub pull request or the current local branch and working tree with parallel, independent reviewers and evidence-based validation. Use when the user asks for code review, invokes the Code Review action from Git Review, or explicitly mentions this skill.
skills-creator
Create or update LiveAgent runtime skills. Use when you need to summarize a workflow into a skill, write it into the fixed user skills root, validate it, package it, or refine a skill's references for LiveAgent's SkillsManager flow.
skills-installer
Install, list enabled, validate, or package LiveAgent skills. Use when you need to inspect the skills enabled in the current conversation, import a local skill directory or package, search/install from ClawHub, install from a GitHub repo/tree URL, or reconcile conflicts during an upgrade.
triaging-incidents
Creating, triaging, updating, and analyzing ServiceNow incidents. Assess severity, check affected CIs, find related incidents, and recommend assignments. Use when the user mentions incidents, INC numbers, outages, service disruptions, ticket creation, triage, priority, severity, ITSM operations, SLA breaches…
reviewing-update-sets
Reviewing, analyzing, and comparing ServiceNow update sets before promotion. Shows changes, risks, dependencies, and conflicts. Use when the user mentions update sets, customizations, promotion, code review, change tracking, pre-deployment review, sysupdatexml, customer updates, "what changed in this update set," or…