Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ChrisGVE/localdata-mcp --skill regressiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ChrisGVE/localdata-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chrisgve/localdata-mcp/regression)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chrisgve/localdata-mcp/regression"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chrisgve/localdata-mcp/regression/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chrisgve/localdata-mcp/regression"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chrisgve/localdata-mcp/regression.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00644 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00258 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00129 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
regression scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 45 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Regression
Build, evaluate, and compare regression models to predict a target variable from features.
Steps
-
Parse arguments. Extract the database name and target column from
$ARGUMENTS. The first argument is the database name, the second is the target variable to predict. -
Explore available features. Call
describe_databasewith the database name. Identify numeric columns as potential predictors. Note the target column's distribution (continuous vs discrete) to confirm regression is appropriate. -
Extract and inspect data. Call
execute_queryto select the target column and candidate feature columns. Check for nulls, outliers, and sufficient row count (at least 30 observations per feature as a rule of thumb). -
Build a linear baseline. Call
analyze_regressionwith the database name, target column, feature columns, and model type "linear". Review the results: R-squared, adjusted R-squared, coefficients, p-values, and residual diagnostics. -
Evaluate baseline performance. Call
evaluate_model_performanceto get detailed metrics: RMSE, MAE, R-squared, and residual analysis. Assess whether the linear model captures the relationship adequately. -
Interpret baseline results. Check for:
- R-squared below 0.3: poor fit, consider non-linear models
- Features with p-values above 0.05: candidates for removal
- Multicollinearity: correlated predictors inflating variance
- Residual patterns: non-random residuals suggest model misspecification
-
Try alternative models if needed. If the linear baseline performs poorly (R-squared below 0.5 or patterned residuals), call
analyze_regressionwith alternative model types:- "ridge" for multicollinearity issues
- "lasso" for feature selection (many predictors)
- "polynomial" for curved relationships
-
Compare models. For each model fitted, compare R-squared, RMSE, and MAE. Select the model with the best balance of performance and interpretability. Simpler models are preferred when performance is comparable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 45 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 67938c8a7af1
regression is a skill published in the GitHub repository ChrisGVE/localdata-mcp (15 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 644 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
regression compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| regressionChrisGVE/localdata-mcp | Skill | 15 | 4d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 24 | Claude Code |
| wingman-mcpadeoluwaadesina/wingman-mcp | Skill | 4 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 68 | Claude Code, Codex |
| liveagent-code-reviewStack-Cairn/LiveAgent | Skill | 2.3k | today | MIT | A | 54 | Claude Code, Codex |
| skills-creatorStack-Cairn/LiveAgent | Skill | 2.3k | today | MIT | A | 53 | Claude Code, Codex |
| skills-installerStack-Cairn/LiveAgent | Skill | 2.3k | today | MIT | A | 62 | Claude Code, Codex |
| himalayas-employerHimalayas-App/himalayas-mcp | Skill | 21 | today | MIT | A | 37 | Claude Code, Codex |
| building-glamorous-tuisnikships/skills-registry | Skill | 25 | 15d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 65 | Claude Code, Codex |