Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/chrislamdev/hermes-core-skills/test-driven-developmentnpx skills add ChrisLamDev/hermes-core-skills --skill test-driven-developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ChrisLamDev/hermes-core-skillsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00033 | $0.02357 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01179 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00471 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00236 |
Grade A, and why
test-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to test-driven-development — 34 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 359 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test-Driven Development (TDD)
Overview
Write the test first. Watch it fail. Write minimal code to pass.
Core principle: If you didn't watch the test fail, you don't know if it tests the right thing.
Violating the letter of the rules is violating the spirit of the rules.
When to Use
Always:
- New features
- Bug fixes
- Refactoring
- Behavior changes
Exceptions (ask the user first):
- Throwaway prototypes
- Generated code
- Configuration files
Thinking "skip TDD just this once"? Stop. That's rationalization.
The Iron Law
NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST
Write code before the test? Delete it. Start over.
No exceptions:
- Don't keep it as "reference"
- Don't "adapt" it while writing tests
- Don't look at it
- Delete means delete
Implement fresh from tests. Period.
Red-Green-Refactor Cycle
RED — Write Failing Test
Write one minimal test showing what should happen.
Good test:
def test_retries_failed_operations_3_times():
attempts = 0
def operation():
nonlocal attempts
attempts += 1
if attempts < 3:
raise Exception('fail')
return 'success'
result = retry_operation(operation)
assert result == 'success'
assert attempts == 3
Clear name, tests real behavior, one thing.
Bad test:
def test_retry_works():
mock = MagicMock()
mock.side_effect = [Exception(), Exception(), 'success']
result = retry_operation(mock)
assert result == 'success' # What about retry count? Timing?
Vague name, tests mock not real code.
Requirements:
- One behavior per test
- Clear descriptive name ("and" in name? Split it)
- Real code, not mocks (unless truly unavoidable)
- Name describes behavior, not implementation
Verify RED — Watch It Fail
MANDATORY. Never skip.
# Use terminal tool to run the specific test
pytest tests/test_feature.py::test_specific_behavior -v
Confirm:
- Test fails (not errors from typos)
- Failure message is expected
- Fails because the feature is missing
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 359 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 08ea6ae11f90
test-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository ChrisLamDev/hermes-core-skills (9 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 2,357 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to test-driven-development, differing in 34 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
implement
TDD implementation (RED→GREEN→REFACTOR) → verify → review.
tdd-workflow
Test-driven development workflow.
implement
Write the production code that makes a pre-decided set of failing tests pass, within an explicit writeset, following an explicit behavior contract. Used by /tdd Step 3 and by /swarm-dispatch workers. The caller has already decided architecture, naming, file layout, and abstraction boundaries — this skill executes that…
scenario
Write executable failing tests from a recipe handed to you by the main context. Used by /tdd Step 2 and ad-hoc when a phase needs tests-first to drive implementation. Decisions about which scenarios to cover, which categories matter, and which fixtures to use are made by the caller — this skill executes that recipe…
test-first
Use when implementing any feature, bugfix, or refactor that has a testable outcome. Activate for keywords like "TDD", "test-first", "red-green", "write the test first", "implement ", "fix ". Enforces the red-green-refactor discipline -- write a failing test, make it pass with the smallest change, refactor with tests…
tdd-with-memory
과거 결정·컨벤션을 회상해 테스트 우선으로 구현하고 새 컨벤션을 기억에 남길 때 사용한다.